Multimodal vs Unimodal Estimation of Sympathetic-Driven Arousal States

Estimation of sympathetic-driven arousal state (SDAS) traditionally consists of computing frequency-based measures of heart rate variability. However, in the presence of confounds such as breathing frequency, these measures can incorrectly estimate the underlying SDAS. In this work, we present an ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Subramanian, Sandya (Author), Brown, Emery (Author), Barbieri, Riccardo (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Computing in Cardiology, 2021-12-20T18:39:24Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01474 am a22001813u 4500
001 138743
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Subramanian, Sandya  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Brown, Emery  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Barbieri, Riccardo  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Multimodal vs Unimodal Estimation of Sympathetic-Driven Arousal States 
260 |b Computing in Cardiology,   |c 2021-12-20T18:39:24Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138743 
520 |a Estimation of sympathetic-driven arousal state (SDAS) traditionally consists of computing frequency-based measures of heart rate variability. However, in the presence of confounds such as breathing frequency, these measures can incorrectly estimate the underlying SDAS. In this work, we present an example of such a case during a three-stage paced breathing task. Using a state space framework, we demonstrate that a unimodal model that relies solely on these frequency-based heart rate variability measures overestimates SDAS during the slowest breathing stage and underestimates it in subsequent stages. On the other hand, a multimodal model with both time and frequency domain heart rate variability observations as well as electrodermal activity information provides a more realistic estimate of SDAS throughout the task. This suggests that multimodal estimation of SDAS is more accurate and robust than unimodal estimation. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t 10.22489/CINC.2020.290 
773 |t Computing in Cardiology