|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01640 am a22001573u 4500 |
001 |
138409 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Fedorenko, Evelina
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a The early origins and the growing popularity of the individual-subject analytic approach in human neuroscience
|
260 |
|
|
|b Elsevier BV,
|c 2021-12-09T19:34:40Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138409
|
520 |
|
|
|a In the last three decades, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has transformed the field of cognitive neuroscience. A standard analytic approach entails aligning a set of individual activation maps in a common brain space, performing a statistical test in each voxel, and interpreting significant activation clusters with respect to macroanatomic landmarks. In the last several years, however, this group-analytic approach is being increasingly replaced by analyses where neural responses are examined within each brain individually. In this opinion piece, I trace the origins of individual-subject analyses in human neuroscience and speculate on why group analyses had risen vastly in popularity during the 2000s. I then discuss a core problem with group analyses - their limited utility in informing the human cognitive architecture - and talk about how the individual-subject functional localization approach solves this problem. Finally, I discuss other reasons for why researchers have been turning to individual-subject analyses, and argue that such approaches are likely to be the future of human neuroscience.
|
546 |
|
|
|a en
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t 10.1016/J.COBEHA.2021.02.023
|
773 |
|
|
|t Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
|