|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01616 am a22001933u 4500 |
001 |
138218 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Yim, Man Yi
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Sadun, Lorenzo A
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Fiete, Ila R
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Taillefumier, Thibaud
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Place-cell capacity and volatility with grid-like inputs
|
260 |
|
|
|b eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd,
|c 2021-11-23T18:29:35Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138218
|
520 |
|
|
|a <jats:p>What factors constrain the arrangement of the multiple fields of a place cell? By modeling place cells as perceptrons that act on multiscale periodic grid-cell inputs, we analytically enumerate a place cell's <jats:italic>repertoire</jats:italic> - how many field arrangements it can realize without external cues while its grid inputs are unique - and derive its <jats:italic>capacity</jats:italic> - the spatial range over which it can achieve any field arrangement. We show that the repertoire is very large and relatively noise-robust. However, the repertoire is a vanishing fraction of all arrangements, while capacity scales only as the sum of the grid periods so field arrangements are constrained over larger distances. Thus, grid-driven place field arrangements define a large response scaffold that is strongly constrained by its structured inputs. Finally, we show that altering grid-place weights to generate an arbitrary new place field strongly affects existing arrangements, which could explain the volatility of the place code.</jats:p>
|
546 |
|
|
|a en
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t 10.7554/ELIFE.62702
|
773 |
|
|
|t eLife
|