Conducting Non-Adaptive Experiments in a Live Setting: A Bayesian Approach to Determining Optimal Sample Size

Copyright © 2019 ASME. This research studies the use of predetermined experimental plans in a live setting with a finite implementation horizon. In this context, we seek to determine the optimal experimental budget in different environments using a Bayesian framework. We derive theoretical results o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sudarsanam, Nandan (Author), Chandran, Ramya (Author), Frey, Daniel D. (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ASME International, 2021-11-09T18:16:34Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01827 am a22001933u 4500
001 138011
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sudarsanam, Nandan  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Chandran, Ramya  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Frey, Daniel D.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Conducting Non-Adaptive Experiments in a Live Setting: A Bayesian Approach to Determining Optimal Sample Size 
260 |b ASME International,   |c 2021-11-09T18:16:34Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138011 
520 |a Copyright © 2019 ASME. This research studies the use of predetermined experimental plans in a live setting with a finite implementation horizon. In this context, we seek to determine the optimal experimental budget in different environments using a Bayesian framework. We derive theoretical results on the optimal allocation of resources to treatments with the objective of minimizing cumulative regret, a metric commonly used in online statistical learning. Our base case studies a setting with two treatments assuming Gaussian priors for the treatment means and noise distributions. We extend our study through analytical and semi-analytical techniques which explore worst-case bounds and the generalization to k treatments. We determine theoretical limits for the experimental budget across all possible scenarios. The optimal level of experimentation that is recommended by this study varies extensively and depends on the experimental environment as well as the number of available units. This highlights the importance of such an approach which incorporates these factors to determine the budget. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t 10.1115/detc2019-98335 
773 |t Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference