Inferring Population Preferences via Mixtures of Spatial Voting Models

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016. Understanding political phenomena requires measuring the political preferences of society. We introduce a model based on mixtures of spatial voting models that infers the underlying distribution of political preferences of voters with only voting records...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nahm, Alison (Author), Pentland, Alex (Author), Krafft, Peter (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer International Publishing, 2021-11-09T14:42:46Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01810 am a22001693u 4500
001 137887
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Nahm, Alison  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Pentland, Alex  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Krafft, Peter  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Inferring Population Preferences via Mixtures of Spatial Voting Models 
260 |b Springer International Publishing,   |c 2021-11-09T14:42:46Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/137887 
520 |a © Springer International Publishing AG 2016. Understanding political phenomena requires measuring the political preferences of society. We introduce a model based on mixtures of spatial voting models that infers the underlying distribution of political preferences of voters with only voting records of the population and political positions of candidates in an election. Beyond offering a costeffective alternative to surveys, this method projects the political preferences of voters and candidates into a shared latent preference space. This projection allows us to directly compare the preferences of the two groups, which is desirable for political science but difficult with traditional survey methods. After validating the aggregated-level inferences of this model against results of related work and on simple prediction tasks, we apply the model to better understand the phenomenon of political polarization in the Texas, New York, and Ohio electorates. Taken at face value, inferences drawn from our model indicate that the electorates in these states may be less bimodal than the distribution of candidates, but that the electorates are comparatively more extreme in their variance. We conclude with a discussion of limitations of our method and potential future directions for research. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t 10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_18