The Economic and Climate Value of Flexibility in Green Energy Markets

Abstract This paper examines how enhanced flexibility across space, time, and a regulatory dimension affects the economic costs and CO $$_2$$ 2 emissions of integrating large shares of intermittent renewable energy from wind and solar. We develop a numerical model which resolves hourly dispatch and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abrell, Jan (Author), Rausch, Sebastian (Author), Streitberger, Clemens (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Joint Program on the Science & Policy of Global Change (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Netherlands, 2021-10-18T18:52:48Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01645 am a22001693u 4500
001 133038
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Abrell, Jan  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Joint Program on the Science & Policy of Global Change  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Rausch, Sebastian  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Streitberger, Clemens  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Economic and Climate Value of Flexibility in Green Energy Markets 
260 |b Springer Netherlands,   |c 2021-10-18T18:52:48Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133038 
520 |a Abstract This paper examines how enhanced flexibility across space, time, and a regulatory dimension affects the economic costs and CO $$_2$$ 2 emissions of integrating large shares of intermittent renewable energy from wind and solar. We develop a numerical model which resolves hourly dispatch and investment choices among heterogeneous energy technologies and natural resources in interconnected wholesale electricity markets, cross-country trade (spatial flexibility), energy storage (temporal flexibility), and tradable green quotas (regulatory flexibility). Taking the model to the data for the case of Europe's system of interconnected electricity markets, we find that the appropriate combination of flexibility can bring about substantial gains in economic efficiency, reduce costs (up to 13.8%) and lower CO $$_2$$ 2 emissions (up to 51.2%). Regulatory flexibility is necessary to realize most of the maximum possible benefits. We also find that gains from increased flexibility are unevenly distributed and that some countries incur welfare losses. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article