Knowledge of Objective 'Oughts': Monotonicity and the New Miners Puzzle
In the classic Miners case, an agent subjectively ought to do what they know is objectively wrong. This case shows that the subjective and objective 'oughts' are somewhat independent. But there remains a powerful intuition that the guidance of objective 'oughts' is more authorita...
Main Author: | Spencer, Jack (Author) |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy (Contributor) |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley,
2021-03-17T13:40:28Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get fulltext |
Similar Items
-
Thoughts and oughts
by: Kalantari, Seyed Ali
Published: (2013) -
If you justifiably believe that you ought to Φ, you ought to Φ
by: Way, Jonathan, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Grasping an Ought. Adolf Reinach’s Ontology and Epistemology of Legal and Moral Oughts
by: Lorenzo Passerini Glazel
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Is meaning fraught with ought?
by: Whiting, Daniel
Published: (2009) -
What Money Is and Ought To Be
by: Dick David G.
Published: (2021-03-01)