Using Student Annotated Hashtags and Emojis to Collect Nuanced Affective States

Determining affective states such as confusion from students' participation in online discussion forums can be useful for instructors of a large classroom. However, manual annotation of forum posts by instructors or paid crowd workers is both time-consuming and expensive. In this work, we harne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang, Amy Xian (Author), Igo, Michele (Author), Facciotti, Marc (Author), Karger, David R (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2021-01-25T18:05:41Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01873 am a22001933u 4500
001 129548
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Zhang, Amy Xian  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Igo, Michele  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Facciotti, Marc  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Karger, David R  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Using Student Annotated Hashtags and Emojis to Collect Nuanced Affective States 
260 |b Association for Computing Machinery (ACM),   |c 2021-01-25T18:05:41Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/129548 
520 |a Determining affective states such as confusion from students' participation in online discussion forums can be useful for instructors of a large classroom. However, manual annotation of forum posts by instructors or paid crowd workers is both time-consuming and expensive. In this work, we harness affordances prevalent in social media to allow students to self-Annotate their discussion posts with a set of hashtags and emojis, a process that is fast and cheap. For students, selfannotation with hashtags and emojis provides another channel for self-expression, as well as a way to signal to instructors and other students on the lookout for certain types of messages. This method also provides an easy way to acquire a labeled dataset of affective states, allowing us distinguish between more nuanced emotions such as confusion and curiosity. From a dataset of over 25,000 discussion posts from two courses containing self-Annotated posts by students, we demonstrate how we can identify linguistic differences between posts expressing confusion versus curiosity, achieving 83% accuracy at distinguishing between the two affective states. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Proceedings of the 4th (2017) ACM Conference on Learning at Scale