On Matching and Thickness in Heterogeneous Dynamic Markets

We study dynamic matching in an infinite-horizon stochastic market. Although all agents are potentially compatible with each other, some are hard to match and others are easy to match. Agents prefer to be matched as soon as possible, and matches are formed either bilaterally or indirectly through ch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Burq, Maximilien (Author), Jaillet, Patrick (Author)
Other Authors: Sloan School of Management (Contributor), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS), 2021-01-08T15:44:29Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02282 am a22002173u 4500
001 129346
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Burq, Maximilien  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Sloan School of Management  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Jaillet, Patrick  |e author 
245 0 0 |a On Matching and Thickness in Heterogeneous Dynamic Markets 
260 |b Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS),   |c 2021-01-08T15:44:29Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/129346 
520 |a We study dynamic matching in an infinite-horizon stochastic market. Although all agents are potentially compatible with each other, some are hard to match and others are easy to match. Agents prefer to be matched as soon as possible, and matches are formed either bilaterally or indirectly through chains. We adopt an asymptotic approach and compute tight bounds on the limit of waiting time of agents under myopic policies that differ in matching technology and prioritization. We find that when hard-to-match agents arrive less frequently than easy-to-match ones, (i) bilateral matching is almost as efficient as chains (waiting times scale similarly under both, though chains always outperform bilateral matching by a constant factor), and (ii) assigning priorities to hard-to-match agents improves their waiting times. When hard-to-match agents arrive more frequently, chains are much more efficient than bilateral matching, and prioritization has no impact. Furthermore, somewhat surprisingly, we find that in a heterogeneous market and under bilateral matching, increasing the arrival rate of hard-to-match agents has a nonmonotone effect on waiting times. This behavior is in contrast with that of a homogeneous dynamic market, where increasing arrival rate always improves waiting time, and it highlights fundamental differences between heterogeneous and homogeneous dynamic markets. 
520 |a National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant OR-1029603) 
520 |a United States. Office of Naval Research (Grants N00014-12-1-0033 and N00014-15-1-2083) 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t 10.1287/OPRE.2018.1826 
773 |t Operations Research