Are women adult human females?

Are women (simply) adult human females? Dictionaries suggest that they are. However, philosophers who have explicitly considered the question invariably answer no. This paper argues that they are wrong. The orthodox view is that the category woman is a social category, like the categories widow and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Byrne, Alexander (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020-11-04T21:40:53Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01367 am a22001573u 4500
001 128358
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Byrne, Alexander  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy  |e contributor 
245 0 0 |a Are women adult human females? 
260 |b Springer Science and Business Media LLC,   |c 2020-11-04T21:40:53Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128358 
520 |a Are women (simply) adult human females? Dictionaries suggest that they are. However, philosophers who have explicitly considered the question invariably answer no. This paper argues that they are wrong. The orthodox view is that the category woman is a social category, like the categories widow and police officer, although exactly what this social category consists in is a matter of considerable disagreement. In any event, orthodoxy has it that woman is definitely not a biological category, like the categories amphibian or adult human female. In the first part, a number of arguments are given for the view that women are adult human females; the second part turns to rebutting the main objections. Finally, a couple of morals are briefly noted, one for activist sloganeering, and one for ameliorative projects that seek to change the meaning of 'woman'. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Philosophical Studies