Death of the salesman but not the sales force: how interested promotion skews scientific valuation

Whereas research has demonstrated how social cues appearing as disinterested social validation can skew valuation processes, interested promotion may be at least as important. This factor is examined here via the premature death of 720 elite life scientists. Especially when scientists are young and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Azoulay, Pierre (Author), Wahlen, Jesse Michael (Author), Zuckerman Sivan, Ezra W. (Author)
Other Authors: Sloan School of Management (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Chicago Press, 2020-05-19T19:57:13Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01534 am a22001933u 4500
001 125324
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Azoulay, Pierre  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Sloan School of Management  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Wahlen, Jesse Michael  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zuckerman Sivan, Ezra W.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Death of the salesman but not the sales force: how interested promotion skews scientific valuation 
260 |b University of Chicago Press,   |c 2020-05-19T19:57:13Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125324 
520 |a Whereas research has demonstrated how social cues appearing as disinterested social validation can skew valuation processes, interested promotion may be at least as important. This factor is examined here via the premature death of 720 elite life scientists. Especially when scientists are young and their articles have received little attention, their deaths stimulate a long-lasting, positive increase in citation rates, relative to trajectories for equivalent articles authored by counterfactual (i.e., still-living) scientists. These patterns seem largely explained by a spike in posthumous recognition efforts by the deceased scientists' associates. The upshot is clear evidence of informational inefficiency, which derives from the challenges of absorbing the massive volume of research produced by the scientific community and from its ambivalence about the norm of disinterestedness. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t 10.1086/706800 
773 |t American Journal of Sociology