First observation of p-odd γ asymmetry in polarized neutron capture on hydrogen

We report the first observation of the parity-violating gamma-ray asymmetry A[subscript γ under superscript np] in neutron-proton capture using polarized cold neutrons incident on a liquid parahydrogen target at the Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. A[subscript γ under supe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Musgrave, Matthew (Author), NPDGamma Collaboration (Author)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Nuclear Science (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society, 2020-04-23T20:12:34Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01593 am a22001813u 4500
001 124841
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Musgrave, Matthew  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Nuclear Science  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a NPDGamma Collaboration  |e author 
245 0 0 |a First observation of p-odd γ asymmetry in polarized neutron capture on hydrogen 
260 |b American Physical Society,   |c 2020-04-23T20:12:34Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124841 
520 |a We report the first observation of the parity-violating gamma-ray asymmetry A[subscript γ under superscript np] in neutron-proton capture using polarized cold neutrons incident on a liquid parahydrogen target at the Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. A[subscript γ under superscript np] isolates the ΔI=1, ³S[subscript 1]→³P[subscript 1] component of the weak nucleon-nucleon interaction, which is dominated by pion exchange and can be directly related to a single coupling constant in either the DDH meson exchange model or pionless effective field theory. We measured A[subscript γ under superscript np]=[-3.0±1.4(stat)±0.2(syst)]×10-⁸, which implies a DDH weak πNN coupling of h[subscript π under superscript 1]=[2.6±1.2(stat)±0.2(syst)]×10-⁷ and a pionless EFT constant of [physics equation; see resource]. We describe the experiment, data analysis, systematic uncertainties, and implications of the result. ©2018 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.242002 
773 |t Physical review letters