Two-Sided Learning and the Ratchet Principle

I study a class of continuous-time games of learning and imperfect monitoring. A long-run player and a market share a common prior about the initial value of a Gaussian hidden state, and learn about its subsequent values by observing a noisy public signal. The long-run player can nevertheless contro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cisternas Leyton, Gonzalo Sebastian (Author)
Other Authors: Sloan School of Management (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019-10-03T18:59:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01516 am a22001573u 4500
001 122362
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Cisternas Leyton, Gonzalo Sebastian  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Sloan School of Management  |e contributor 
245 0 0 |a Two-Sided Learning and the Ratchet Principle 
260 |b Oxford University Press (OUP),   |c 2019-10-03T18:59:00Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122362 
520 |a I study a class of continuous-time games of learning and imperfect monitoring. A long-run player and a market share a common prior about the initial value of a Gaussian hidden state, and learn about its subsequent values by observing a noisy public signal. The long-run player can nevertheless control the evolution of this signal, and thus affect the market's belief. The public signal has an additive structure, and noise is Brownian. I derive conditions for an ordinary differential equation to characterize equilibrium behavior in which the long-run player's actions depend on the history of the game only through the market's correct belief. Using these conditions, I demonstrate the existence of pure-strategy equilibria in Markov strategies for settings in which the long-run player's flow utility is nonlinear. The central finding is a learning-driven ratchet principle affecting incentives. I illustrate the economic implications of this principle in applications to monetary policy, earnings management, and career concerns. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Review of Economic Studies