|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01693 am a22001933u 4500 |
| 001 |
118653 |
| 042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Banerjee, Dwaipayan
|e author
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society
|e contributor
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Banerjee, Dwaipayan
|e contributor
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Banerjee, Dwaipayan
|e contributor
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Copeman, Jacob
|e author
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Ungiven: Philanthropy as critique
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b Cambridge University Press,
|c 2018-10-22T17:33:50Z.
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118653
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Drawing on field research principally from contexts of medical blood donation in North India, this article describes how gifts that are given often critique-by obviation-those that remain ungiven: the care not provided by the Indian state for Bhopal survivors, the family members unwilling to donate blood for their transfusion-requiring relative, and so on. In this way, giving can come to look like a form of criticism. The critiques that acts of giving stage are of absences and deficits: we present cases where large paper hearts donated by survivors of the 1984 Bhopal Gas Disaster to the prime minister of India signal his lack of one, where donated human blood critiques others' unwillingness to do so, where acts of blood donation critique and protest communal violence, and where similar acts of giving over simultaneously highlight a deficit in familial affects and an attempt to resuscitate damaged relational forms. We thus illustrate how critique can operate philanthropically by way of partonomic relations between the given and not-given.
|
| 546 |
|
|
|a en_US
|
| 655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
| 773 |
|
|
|t Modern Asian Studies
|
