Design for structural and energy performance of long span buildings using geometric multi-objective optimization

This paper addresses the potential of multi-objective optimization (MOO) in conceptual design to help designers generate and select solutions from a geometrically diverse range of high-performing building forms. With a focus on the long span building typology, this research employs a MOO approach th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brown, Nathan Collin (Contributor), Mueller, Caitlin T (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (Contributor), Mueller, Caitlin T. (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier, 2018-10-09T18:54:19Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02272 am a22002053u 4500
001 118400
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Brown, Nathan Collin  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Mueller, Caitlin T.  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Brown, Nathan Collin  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Mueller, Caitlin T  |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Mueller, Caitlin T  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Design for structural and energy performance of long span buildings using geometric multi-objective optimization 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2018-10-09T18:54:19Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118400 
520 |a This paper addresses the potential of multi-objective optimization (MOO) in conceptual design to help designers generate and select solutions from a geometrically diverse range of high-performing building forms. With a focus on the long span building typology, this research employs a MOO approach that uses both finite element structural modeling and building energy simulations simultaneously to generate optimized building shapes that are not constrained to regular, rectilinear geometric configurations. Through a series of case studies that explore performance tradeoffs of enclosed arches and static overhangs in different climates, this paper shows how MOO can yield architecturally expressive, high-performing designs, which makes the process more attractive to designers searching for creative forms. It also provides new insight into specific design responses to various climatic constraints, since optimization that considers both structure and energy can shift best solutions in unexpected ways. Finally, by displaying performance results in terms of embodied and operational energy, this paper presents new data showing how considerations of structural material efficiency compare in magnitude to total building energy usage. Together, these three contributions can influence current sustainable design strategies for building typologies that have significant structural requirements. Keywords: Multi-objective optimization; Conceptual design; Embodied energy; Operational energy; Design tradeoffs 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Energy and Buildings