|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01673 am a22001813u 4500 |
001 |
113241 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Fudenberg, Drew
|e author
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Fudenberg, Drew
|e contributor
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a He, Kevin
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Imhof, Lorens A.
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Bayesian posteriors for arbitrarily rare events
|
260 |
|
|
|b National Academy of Sciences,
|c 2018-01-19T20:28:12Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/113241
|
520 |
|
|
|a We study how much data a Bayesian observer needs to correctly infer the relative likelihoods of two events when both events are arbitrarily rare. Each period, either a blue die or a red die is tossed. The two dice land on side 1 with unknown probabilities p[subscript 1] and q[subscript 1], which can be arbitrarily low. Given a data-generating process where p[subscript 1] ≥cq[subscript 1], we are interested in how much data are required to guarantee that with high probability the observer's Bayesian posterior mean for p[subscript 1] exceeds (1-δ)c times that for q[subscript 1]. If the prior densities for the two dice are positive on the interior of the parameter space and behave like power functions at the boundary, then for every ϵ > 0; there exists a finite N so that the observer obtains such an inference after n periods with probability at least 1-ϵ whenever np 1 ≥N. The condition on n and p[subscript 1] is the best possible. The result can fail if one of the prior densities converges to zero exponentially fast at the boundary.
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
|