Verstehen for Sociology: Comment on Watts

• Main Authors: Turco, Catherine Joan (Contributor), Zuckerman Sivan, Ezra W (Contributor)
• Other Authors: Sloan School of Management (Contributor)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: University of Chicago Press, 2018-01-16T20:42:13Z.
• Subjects: Article
• Online Access: Get fulltext

 Duncan Watts, in "Common Sense and Sociological Explanations" (AJS 120 [2014]: 313-51) has done our field a great service by raising a question at the heart of the sociological enterprise: What makes for valuable sociology, and when does it improve upon commonsense explanations? Watts makes three key observations that we believe are quite productive to contemplate. First, one may distinguish between two distinct modes of sociological inquiry: a verstehen (Weber 1968; Watts, p. 318) mode that resembles commonsense explanations in that it aims to establish an empathetic link between the readers or users of such accounts and the actors who populate them; and a "causal" mode, which seeks to identify "generalizable causal mechanisms" (Watts, p. 327; cf. Hedström 2005) that can, in principle, generate testable predictions and, thus, be vetted for their causal validity. Second, sociological theories must have greater causal validity than commonsense explanations if sociology is to make good on its promise of being more valuable than mere common sense. Third, in conducting their research, sociologists often focus on the verstehen mode without engaging in the causal mode.