Responses

Thanks to Mitch, Zoltan and Liz for their insightful and constructive comments. Their expositions of what I am trying to do in the book seem to me entirely accurate, and their suggestions about the way the framework I develop can be modified and extended, as well as their observations about places w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stalnaker, Robert (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Netherlands, 2017-05-24T19:40:28Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 00978 am a22001693u 4500
001 109326
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Stalnaker, Robert  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Stalnaker, Robert  |e contributor 
245 0 0 |a Responses 
260 |b Springer Netherlands,   |c 2017-05-24T19:40:28Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109326 
520 |a Thanks to Mitch, Zoltan and Liz for their insightful and constructive comments. Their expositions of what I am trying to do in the book seem to me entirely accurate, and their suggestions about the way the framework I develop can be modified and extended, as well as their observations about places where more clarity is needed, are well taken. Mostly in these responses I will be elaborating and expressing agreement, though I will push back at just a few points. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Philosophical Studies