Edges and linearization: A reply

This is my reply to the commentaries on Trinh (2009). I thank the commentators - Enoch Aboh, Josef Bayer, Nigel Duffield, Roland Hinterhölzl, Anders Holmberg, Shinichiro Ishihara and Gereon Müller - for their helpful critiques, which point out several shortcomings of the target paper, opened up ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trinh, Tue Huu (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Walter de Gruyter, 2017-05-05T23:38:43Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01393 am a22001693u 4500
001 108720
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Trinh, Tue Huu  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Trinh, Tue Huu  |e contributor 
245 0 0 |a Edges and linearization: A reply 
260 |b Walter de Gruyter,   |c 2017-05-05T23:38:43Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108720 
520 |a This is my reply to the commentaries on Trinh (2009). I thank the commentators - Enoch Aboh, Josef Bayer, Nigel Duffield, Roland Hinterhölzl, Anders Holmberg, Shinichiro Ishihara and Gereon Müller - for their helpful critiques, which point out several shortcomings of the target paper, opened up areas where new predictions can be made and raised questions to be investigated in future research. It is unfortunate that these critiques and this reply did not appear in the same volume. The first section of the reply will hence be a brief summary of my proposal. The theory will be presented in a slightly different way, more transparent than the original formulation but equivalent with it in content. It is my hope that the reformulation will address some of the questions raised in the commentaries. Other issues are discussed in the sections that follow 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Theoretical Linguistics