|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02034 am a22001813u 4500 |
001 |
105462 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Mitsos, Alexander
|e author
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
|e contributor
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Tsoukalas, Angelos
|e contributor
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Tsoukalas, Angelos
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Global optimization of generalized semi-infinite programs via restriction of the right hand side
|
260 |
|
|
|b Springer US,
|c 2016-11-29T16:48:42Z.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/105462
|
520 |
|
|
|a The algorithm proposed in Mitsos (Optimization 60(10-11):1291-1308, 2011) for the global optimization of semi-infinite programs is extended to the global optimization of generalized semi-infinite programs. No convexity or concavity assumptions are made. The algorithm employs convergent lower and upper bounds which are based on regular (in general nonconvex) nonlinear programs (NLP) solved by a (black-box) deterministic global NLP solver. The lower bounding procedure is based on a discretization of the lower-level host set; the set is populated with Slater points of the lower-level program that result in constraint violations of prior upper-level points visited by the lower bounding procedure. The purpose of the lower bounding procedure is only to generate a certificate of optimality; in trivial cases it can also generate a global solution point. The upper bounding procedure generates candidate optimal points; it is based on an approximation of the feasible set using a discrete restriction of the lower-level feasible set and a restriction of the right-hand side constraints (both lower and upper level). Under relatively mild assumptions, the algorithm is shown to converge finitely to a truly feasible point which is approximately optimal as established from the lower bound. Test cases from the literature are solved and the algorithm is shown to be computationally efficient.
|
546 |
|
|
|a en
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
773 |
|
|
|t Journal of Global Optimization
|