|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01844 am a22001933u 4500 |
| 001 |
50542 |
| 042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Hanapi, Siti Zulaiha
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a M. Awad, Hassan
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Sheikh Ali, Sheikh Imranudin
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Mat Sarip, Siti Hajar
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Sarmidi, Mohamad Roji
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Aziz, Ramlan
|e author
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Agriculture wastes conversion for biofertilizer production using beneficial microorganisms for sustainable agriculture applications
|
| 260 |
|
|
|c 2013.
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/50542/1/SitiZulaihaHanapi2013_Agriculturewastesconversion.pdf
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Aims: The emphasis of this study is to generate new valuable bioproducts from non-toxic cleaning waste for environmental healing technology. Methodology and Results: Comparisons between different types of biofertilizer formulations and the field trial effectiveness were done. Results indicated that biofertilizer C contained the highest N value (1.8%) when compared with biofertilizers B and A, which only contained 1.7% and 1.4%, respectively. Biofertilizer A showed significant difference in the total count of yeast, mould, ammonia oxidizing bacteria and nitrate oxidizing bacteria compared to biofertilizer B and C. Meanwhile, biofertilizer C was found to be significantly different from others in Lactobacillus sp. and nitrogen-fixing bacteria count. Photosynthetic total count and Actinomycetes sp. were not noticed in all formulations tested. Conclusion, significance and impact of study: The findings of this study suggest that biofertilizer A is suitable to be used as a promotional biofertilizer in flower and fruit production, biofertilizer B can be used for a leafy crop, while biofertilizer C is good for the growth of roots and stem of plants
|
| 546 |
|
|
|a en
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a R Medicine
|
