So close yet so far: Economic accessibility of Mount Kinabalu / Christy Bidder ... [et al.]

This study examined the economic accessibility of Mount Kinabalu perceived by the local people of Sabah. Specifically, this study i) examined the concept of willingness to pay (WTP) in light of its association with perceived fee fairness, spending support and place attachment; and ii) analysed the e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bidder, Christy (Author), Polus, Reni Cacillia (Author), Jones, Thomas Edward (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UiTM Press, 2017-06.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
View Fulltext in UiTM IR
LEADER 02249 am a22002053u 4500
001 44641
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Bidder, Christy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Polus, Reni Cacillia  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jones, Thomas Edward  |e author 
245 0 0 |a So close yet so far: Economic accessibility of Mount Kinabalu / Christy Bidder ... [et al.] 
260 |b UiTM Press,   |c 2017-06. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/44641/1/44641.pdf 
856 |z View Fulltext in UiTM IR  |u https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/44641/ 
520 |a This study examined the economic accessibility of Mount Kinabalu perceived by the local people of Sabah. Specifically, this study i) examined the concept of willingness to pay (WTP) in light of its association with perceived fee fairness, spending support and place attachment; and ii) analysed the economic and non- economic variables that could potentially pose constraints for the local people to climb Mount Kinabalu and; iii) proved that the inflated total climbing fee had posed a financial barrier for them to access their heritage mountain. The results showed that income is not a significant antecedent of local people's WTP to climb Mount Kinabalu, and the new fee structure itself does not pose a huge barrier for them to access the mountain. The dramatic drop in the number of local climbers following the fee increases is plausibly attributable to their negative perception of fee fairness which lowers their WTP. Additionally, they are more constrained by intrapersonal reasons such as the amount of physical demand required, concerns about health and fitness, and risks involved in climbing than interpersonal or structural factors. When it comes to their spending preferences, they are more supportive of spending on a collective cause (i.e. environmental protection) than an individual cause (i.e. improvement of facilities and services). In sum, cost-related factor does not make Mount Kinabalu less accessible for the local people. What is influencing their WTP is their perception of fee fairness. This study concludes with some recommendations for the management. 
546 |a en 
650 0 4 |a Travel and state. Tourism 
650 0 4 |a Ecotourism 
650 0 4 |a Mountain tourism 
655 7 |a Article