Bias in animal studies of estrogen effects on cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials on menopausal hormone therapy in humans have not confirmed the benefit of estrogens on cardiovascular disease found in animal studies. Flawed methodology or publication bias in animal studies may explain the dicrepancy. Objectives The aim of this stud...
Main Authors: | Christopher Friis Berntsen, Pernille Rootwelt, Anders Erik Astrup Dahm |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12507 |
Similar Items
-
The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
by: Andrija Babic, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
The protective role of estrogen and estrogen receptors in cardiovascular disease and the controversial use of estrogen therapy
by: Andrea Iorga, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01) -
Prevalence of cardiovascular disease among Bangladeshi adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies
by: Chowdhury MZI, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
The Effect of Estrogen Replacement Therapy on Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease in Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis
by: Yu-jia Song, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Assessing the risk of performance and detection bias in Cochrane reviews as a joint domain is less accurate compared to two separate domains
by: Ognjen Barcot, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)