A comparison of imputation procedures and statistical tests for the analysis of two-dimensional electrophoresis data

• Main Authors: Sellers Kimberly F, Damodaran Senthilkumar, Miecznikowski Jeffrey C, Rabin Richard A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2010-12-01
• Series: Proteome Science
• Online Access: http://www.proteomesci.com/content/8/1/66

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Numerous gel-based softwares exist to detect protein changes potentially associated with disease. The data, however, are abundant with technical and structural complexities, making statistical analysis a difficult task. A particularly important topic is how the various softwares handle missing data. To date, no one has extensively studied the impact that interpolating missing data has on subsequent analysis of protein spots.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>This work highlights the existing algorithms for handling missing data in two-dimensional gel analysis and performs a thorough comparison of the various algorithms and statistical tests on simulated and real datasets. For imputation methods, the best results in terms of root mean squared error are obtained using the least squares method of imputation along with the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm approach to estimate missing values with an array covariance structure. The bootstrapped versions of the statistical tests offer the most liberal option for determining protein spot significance while the generalized family wise error rate (gFWER) should be considered for controlling the multiple testing error.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In summary, we advocate for a three-step statistical analysis of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) data with a data imputation step, choice of statistical test, and lastly an error control method in light of multiple testing. When determining the choice of statistical test, it is worth considering whether the protein spots will be subjected to mass spectrometry. If this is the case a more liberal test such as the percentile-based bootstrap <it>t </it>can be employed. For error control in electrophoresis experiments, we advocate that gFWER be controlled for multiple testing rather than the false discovery rate.</p>