Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles
The aims of this study were to examine and compare the consistency of personal epistemology profiles among university students representing three academic disciplines. Student interview data (N = 87) were analyzed in order to reveal students' conceptions of knowledge, thinking, and reasoning. T...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Education Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/807645 |
id |
doaj-ffdfa87d707844c491a96a7e6297706d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ffdfa87d707844c491a96a7e6297706d2020-11-24T22:57:47ZengHindawi LimitedEducation Research International2090-40022090-40102012-01-01201210.1155/2012/807645807645Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual ProfilesMinna Kaartinen-Koutaniemi0Sari Lindblom-Ylänne1Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 3, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandInstitute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 3, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandThe aims of this study were to examine and compare the consistency of personal epistemology profiles among university students representing three academic disciplines. Student interview data (N = 87) were analyzed in order to reveal students' conceptions of knowledge, thinking, and reasoning. The individual answers were examined and rated on a scale from absolutist to evaluativist thinking. On the basis of the student answers, three personal epistemology profiles were identified from the data: (i) absolutist profiles; (ii) relativistic profiles; and (iii) evaluativist profiles consisting of the subgroups entitled “limited” and “sophisticated.” The categorization of personal epistemology profiles was compared with background variables such as age, major subject, and study phase. The results indicated that the personal epistemology profiles varied significantly among students on the basis of the background variables. Explanations for the consistent and inconsistent personal epistemology profiles are discussed in more detail.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/807645 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Minna Kaartinen-Koutaniemi Sari Lindblom-Ylänne |
spellingShingle |
Minna Kaartinen-Koutaniemi Sari Lindblom-Ylänne Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles Education Research International |
author_facet |
Minna Kaartinen-Koutaniemi Sari Lindblom-Ylänne |
author_sort |
Minna Kaartinen-Koutaniemi |
title |
Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles |
title_short |
Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles |
title_full |
Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles |
title_fullStr |
Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles |
title_full_unstemmed |
Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles |
title_sort |
personal epistemology of university students: individual profiles |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Education Research International |
issn |
2090-4002 2090-4010 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
The aims of this study were to examine and compare the consistency of personal epistemology profiles among university students representing three academic disciplines. Student interview data (N = 87) were analyzed in order to reveal students' conceptions of knowledge, thinking, and reasoning. The individual answers were examined and rated on a scale from absolutist to evaluativist thinking. On the basis of the student answers, three personal epistemology profiles were identified from the data: (i) absolutist profiles; (ii) relativistic profiles; and (iii) evaluativist profiles consisting of the subgroups entitled “limited” and “sophisticated.” The categorization of personal epistemology profiles was compared with background variables such as age, major subject, and study phase. The results indicated that the personal epistemology profiles varied significantly among students on the basis of the background variables. Explanations for the consistent and inconsistent personal epistemology profiles are discussed in more detail. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/807645 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT minnakaartinenkoutaniemi personalepistemologyofuniversitystudentsindividualprofiles AT sarilindblomylanne personalepistemologyofuniversitystudentsindividualprofiles |
_version_ |
1725649222831702016 |