Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles

The aims of this study were to examine and compare the consistency of personal epistemology profiles among university students representing three academic disciplines. Student interview data (N = 87) were analyzed in order to reveal students' conceptions of knowledge, thinking, and reasoning. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minna Kaartinen-Koutaniemi, Sari Lindblom-Ylänne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Education Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/807645
id doaj-ffdfa87d707844c491a96a7e6297706d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ffdfa87d707844c491a96a7e6297706d2020-11-24T22:57:47ZengHindawi LimitedEducation Research International2090-40022090-40102012-01-01201210.1155/2012/807645807645Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual ProfilesMinna Kaartinen-Koutaniemi0Sari Lindblom-Ylänne1Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 3, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandInstitute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 3, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandThe aims of this study were to examine and compare the consistency of personal epistemology profiles among university students representing three academic disciplines. Student interview data (N = 87) were analyzed in order to reveal students' conceptions of knowledge, thinking, and reasoning. The individual answers were examined and rated on a scale from absolutist to evaluativist thinking. On the basis of the student answers, three personal epistemology profiles were identified from the data: (i) absolutist profiles; (ii) relativistic profiles; and (iii) evaluativist profiles consisting of the subgroups entitled “limited” and “sophisticated.” The categorization of personal epistemology profiles was compared with background variables such as age, major subject, and study phase. The results indicated that the personal epistemology profiles varied significantly among students on the basis of the background variables. Explanations for the consistent and inconsistent personal epistemology profiles are discussed in more detail.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/807645
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Minna Kaartinen-Koutaniemi
Sari Lindblom-Ylänne
spellingShingle Minna Kaartinen-Koutaniemi
Sari Lindblom-Ylänne
Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles
Education Research International
author_facet Minna Kaartinen-Koutaniemi
Sari Lindblom-Ylänne
author_sort Minna Kaartinen-Koutaniemi
title Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles
title_short Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles
title_full Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles
title_fullStr Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles
title_full_unstemmed Personal Epistemology of University Students: Individual Profiles
title_sort personal epistemology of university students: individual profiles
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Education Research International
issn 2090-4002
2090-4010
publishDate 2012-01-01
description The aims of this study were to examine and compare the consistency of personal epistemology profiles among university students representing three academic disciplines. Student interview data (N = 87) were analyzed in order to reveal students' conceptions of knowledge, thinking, and reasoning. The individual answers were examined and rated on a scale from absolutist to evaluativist thinking. On the basis of the student answers, three personal epistemology profiles were identified from the data: (i) absolutist profiles; (ii) relativistic profiles; and (iii) evaluativist profiles consisting of the subgroups entitled “limited” and “sophisticated.” The categorization of personal epistemology profiles was compared with background variables such as age, major subject, and study phase. The results indicated that the personal epistemology profiles varied significantly among students on the basis of the background variables. Explanations for the consistent and inconsistent personal epistemology profiles are discussed in more detail.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/807645
work_keys_str_mv AT minnakaartinenkoutaniemi personalepistemologyofuniversitystudentsindividualprofiles
AT sarilindblomylanne personalepistemologyofuniversitystudentsindividualprofiles
_version_ 1725649222831702016