Le général et le particulier. Perspective analytique et praxéologique sur la règle de droit

The legal vulgate holds generality as constitutive of the rule. This widely repeated and sometimes criticized definition refers to the formal properties of the rule and not to the rule as it is formulated, read and applied in the concreteness of its practices. The article intends to operate this “re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baudouin Dupret
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: ENS Éditions 2018-07-01
Series:Tracés
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/traces/7916
id doaj-ffdc2d26f4084e30aae897b18606b0ef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ffdc2d26f4084e30aae897b18606b0ef2020-11-25T02:07:49ZfraENS ÉditionsTracés1763-00611963-18122018-07-013412314210.4000/traces.7916Le général et le particulier. Perspective analytique et praxéologique sur la règle de droitBaudouin DupretThe legal vulgate holds generality as constitutive of the rule. This widely repeated and sometimes criticized definition refers to the formal properties of the rule and not to the rule as it is formulated, read and applied in the concreteness of its practices. The article intends to operate this “re-specification” of the question of the rule, starting from its conceptual constituents, to grasp the relation of reference and use that those who invoke it can have in context. The general and the particular are therefore transformed into categories of practical reasoning, that is, into the achievements of those who resort to the rule in the course of their public, political or judicial actions. In order to deal with the relation of the particular to the general in the practice of law, the article will, first of all, deal with the conception of the rule and its general and abstract character in the doctrine and theory of law. It will then take up the issue from the perspective of practitioners and users of the law. Finally, it will study the so-called “burkini” case to examine how the issue is deployed, in a contingent manner, on a three-tiered level: that of “opinion”, that of the administrative authority, and that of the authority that judges.http://journals.openedition.org/traces/7916legal rulecharacters of the legal rulejurisprudencepraxeology of lawlegal practicesIslam in France
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Baudouin Dupret
spellingShingle Baudouin Dupret
Le général et le particulier. Perspective analytique et praxéologique sur la règle de droit
Tracés
legal rule
characters of the legal rule
jurisprudence
praxeology of law
legal practices
Islam in France
author_facet Baudouin Dupret
author_sort Baudouin Dupret
title Le général et le particulier. Perspective analytique et praxéologique sur la règle de droit
title_short Le général et le particulier. Perspective analytique et praxéologique sur la règle de droit
title_full Le général et le particulier. Perspective analytique et praxéologique sur la règle de droit
title_fullStr Le général et le particulier. Perspective analytique et praxéologique sur la règle de droit
title_full_unstemmed Le général et le particulier. Perspective analytique et praxéologique sur la règle de droit
title_sort le général et le particulier. perspective analytique et praxéologique sur la règle de droit
publisher ENS Éditions
series Tracés
issn 1763-0061
1963-1812
publishDate 2018-07-01
description The legal vulgate holds generality as constitutive of the rule. This widely repeated and sometimes criticized definition refers to the formal properties of the rule and not to the rule as it is formulated, read and applied in the concreteness of its practices. The article intends to operate this “re-specification” of the question of the rule, starting from its conceptual constituents, to grasp the relation of reference and use that those who invoke it can have in context. The general and the particular are therefore transformed into categories of practical reasoning, that is, into the achievements of those who resort to the rule in the course of their public, political or judicial actions. In order to deal with the relation of the particular to the general in the practice of law, the article will, first of all, deal with the conception of the rule and its general and abstract character in the doctrine and theory of law. It will then take up the issue from the perspective of practitioners and users of the law. Finally, it will study the so-called “burkini” case to examine how the issue is deployed, in a contingent manner, on a three-tiered level: that of “opinion”, that of the administrative authority, and that of the authority that judges.
topic legal rule
characters of the legal rule
jurisprudence
praxeology of law
legal practices
Islam in France
url http://journals.openedition.org/traces/7916
work_keys_str_mv AT baudouindupret legeneraletleparticulierperspectiveanalytiqueetpraxeologiquesurlareglededroit
_version_ 1724929525191540736