Evaluating rectal swab collection method for gut microbiome analysis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is increasingly used as an animal model for biomedical research; however, gastrointestinal diseases causing significant morbidity are endemic in many captive marmoset colonies. Establishing gut microbiome patterns in a marmoset colony may aid in clinical deci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen C Artim, Alexander Sheh, Monika A Burns, James G Fox
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224950
id doaj-ffdbc9235f734bee9e61147dafc8dfc6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ffdbc9235f734bee9e61147dafc8dfc62021-03-04T11:21:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011411e022495010.1371/journal.pone.0224950Evaluating rectal swab collection method for gut microbiome analysis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).Stephen C ArtimAlexander ShehMonika A BurnsJames G FoxThe common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is increasingly used as an animal model for biomedical research; however, gastrointestinal diseases causing significant morbidity are endemic in many captive marmoset colonies. Establishing gut microbiome patterns in a marmoset colony may aid in clinical decision-making and model reproducibility. A standardized method of sample collection and storage is essential for proper interpretation of microbiome data. While microbiome studies commonly utilize fecal samples, the goal of this study was to determine whether the microbiome profile from a rectal swab performed on a sedated animal was comparable to the microbiome profile from a fecal sample. During routine physical exams, paired fecal and rectal swab samples were collected from each of 23 marmosets. DNA was extracted from all fecal and rectal swab samples and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences were amplified and analyzed. Initial comparison of the relative abundance of bacterial phyla between paired samples had a r2 value of 0.70 with S of 0.08 with no significant differences in α and β diversity metrics between fecal and rectal samples. Initial analysis however, revealed 5 discordant fecal-rectal pairs which corresponded only with the 5 rectal swabs that were classified as free of visible fecal matter during collection. Exclusion of these 5 pairs resulted in an optimized fit of the data as evidenced by a r2 value of 0.91 with S of 0.05. These results demonstrate that rectal swabs are a reliable method for profiling the fecal microbiome in the marmoset since the bacterial composition from a rectal swab with visible fecal contents correlated well with the bacterial composition from a fecal sample from the same marmoset. This study highlights the importance of standardized sample collection methods and exclusion of inappropriate samples.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224950
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephen C Artim
Alexander Sheh
Monika A Burns
James G Fox
spellingShingle Stephen C Artim
Alexander Sheh
Monika A Burns
James G Fox
Evaluating rectal swab collection method for gut microbiome analysis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).
PLoS ONE
author_facet Stephen C Artim
Alexander Sheh
Monika A Burns
James G Fox
author_sort Stephen C Artim
title Evaluating rectal swab collection method for gut microbiome analysis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).
title_short Evaluating rectal swab collection method for gut microbiome analysis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).
title_full Evaluating rectal swab collection method for gut microbiome analysis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).
title_fullStr Evaluating rectal swab collection method for gut microbiome analysis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating rectal swab collection method for gut microbiome analysis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).
title_sort evaluating rectal swab collection method for gut microbiome analysis in the common marmoset (callithrix jacchus).
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is increasingly used as an animal model for biomedical research; however, gastrointestinal diseases causing significant morbidity are endemic in many captive marmoset colonies. Establishing gut microbiome patterns in a marmoset colony may aid in clinical decision-making and model reproducibility. A standardized method of sample collection and storage is essential for proper interpretation of microbiome data. While microbiome studies commonly utilize fecal samples, the goal of this study was to determine whether the microbiome profile from a rectal swab performed on a sedated animal was comparable to the microbiome profile from a fecal sample. During routine physical exams, paired fecal and rectal swab samples were collected from each of 23 marmosets. DNA was extracted from all fecal and rectal swab samples and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences were amplified and analyzed. Initial comparison of the relative abundance of bacterial phyla between paired samples had a r2 value of 0.70 with S of 0.08 with no significant differences in α and β diversity metrics between fecal and rectal samples. Initial analysis however, revealed 5 discordant fecal-rectal pairs which corresponded only with the 5 rectal swabs that were classified as free of visible fecal matter during collection. Exclusion of these 5 pairs resulted in an optimized fit of the data as evidenced by a r2 value of 0.91 with S of 0.05. These results demonstrate that rectal swabs are a reliable method for profiling the fecal microbiome in the marmoset since the bacterial composition from a rectal swab with visible fecal contents correlated well with the bacterial composition from a fecal sample from the same marmoset. This study highlights the importance of standardized sample collection methods and exclusion of inappropriate samples.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224950
work_keys_str_mv AT stephencartim evaluatingrectalswabcollectionmethodforgutmicrobiomeanalysisinthecommonmarmosetcallithrixjacchus
AT alexandersheh evaluatingrectalswabcollectionmethodforgutmicrobiomeanalysisinthecommonmarmosetcallithrixjacchus
AT monikaaburns evaluatingrectalswabcollectionmethodforgutmicrobiomeanalysisinthecommonmarmosetcallithrixjacchus
AT jamesgfox evaluatingrectalswabcollectionmethodforgutmicrobiomeanalysisinthecommonmarmosetcallithrixjacchus
_version_ 1714803869242884096