Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program

Background: A limited number of studies have explored the association between self-reported symptoms and the risk of breast cancer among participants of population based screening programs. Methods: We performed descriptive statistics on recall, screen-detected and interval cancer, positive predicti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marthe Larsen, Marie Lilleborge, Einar Vigeland, Solveig Hofvind
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:Breast
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977620301685
id doaj-ffc98217aeaa4c1ba6239f64dc7bc3be
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ffc98217aeaa4c1ba6239f64dc7bc3be2020-12-23T04:58:34ZengElsevierBreast1532-30802020-12-01545661Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening programMarthe Larsen0Marie Lilleborge1Einar Vigeland2Solveig Hofvind3Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, NorwaySection for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Radiology, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, NorwaySection for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway; Corresponding author. Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, 0304 Oslo, Norway.Background: A limited number of studies have explored the association between self-reported symptoms and the risk of breast cancer among participants of population based screening programs. Methods: We performed descriptive statistics on recall, screen-detected and interval cancer, positive predictive value and histopathological tumour characteristics by symptom group (asymptomatic, lump, and skin or nipple changes) as reported from 785,642 women aged 50–69 when they attended BreastScreen Norway 1996–2016. Uni- and multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between symptom group and screen-detected or interval cancer. Results were presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A lump or skin/nipple change was reported in 6.2% of the 3,307,697 examinations. The rate of screen-detected cancers per 1000 examinations was 45.2 among women with a self-reported lump and 5.1 among asymptomatic women. Adjusted odds ratio of screen-detected cancer was 10.1 (95% CI: 9.3–11.1) and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.6–2.5) for interval cancer among women with a self-reported lump versus asymptomatic women. Tumour diameter, histologic grade and lymph node involvement of screen-detected and interval cancer were less prognostically favourable for women with a self-reported lump versus asymptomatic women. Conclusion: Despite targeting asymptomatic women, 6.2% of the screening examinations in BreastScreen Norway was performed among women who reported a lump or skin/nipple change when they attended screening. The odds ratio of screen-detected cancer was higher for women with versus without symptoms. Standardized follow-up guidelines might be beneficial for screening programs in order to take care of women reporting signs or symptoms of breast cancer when they attend screening.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977620301685Breast neoplasmMass ScreeningSigns and SymptomsPrognosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marthe Larsen
Marie Lilleborge
Einar Vigeland
Solveig Hofvind
spellingShingle Marthe Larsen
Marie Lilleborge
Einar Vigeland
Solveig Hofvind
Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program
Breast
Breast neoplasm
Mass Screening
Signs and Symptoms
Prognosis
author_facet Marthe Larsen
Marie Lilleborge
Einar Vigeland
Solveig Hofvind
author_sort Marthe Larsen
title Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program
title_short Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program
title_full Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program
title_fullStr Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program
title_full_unstemmed Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program
title_sort self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program
publisher Elsevier
series Breast
issn 1532-3080
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Background: A limited number of studies have explored the association between self-reported symptoms and the risk of breast cancer among participants of population based screening programs. Methods: We performed descriptive statistics on recall, screen-detected and interval cancer, positive predictive value and histopathological tumour characteristics by symptom group (asymptomatic, lump, and skin or nipple changes) as reported from 785,642 women aged 50–69 when they attended BreastScreen Norway 1996–2016. Uni- and multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between symptom group and screen-detected or interval cancer. Results were presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A lump or skin/nipple change was reported in 6.2% of the 3,307,697 examinations. The rate of screen-detected cancers per 1000 examinations was 45.2 among women with a self-reported lump and 5.1 among asymptomatic women. Adjusted odds ratio of screen-detected cancer was 10.1 (95% CI: 9.3–11.1) and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.6–2.5) for interval cancer among women with a self-reported lump versus asymptomatic women. Tumour diameter, histologic grade and lymph node involvement of screen-detected and interval cancer were less prognostically favourable for women with a self-reported lump versus asymptomatic women. Conclusion: Despite targeting asymptomatic women, 6.2% of the screening examinations in BreastScreen Norway was performed among women who reported a lump or skin/nipple change when they attended screening. The odds ratio of screen-detected cancer was higher for women with versus without symptoms. Standardized follow-up guidelines might be beneficial for screening programs in order to take care of women reporting signs or symptoms of breast cancer when they attend screening.
topic Breast neoplasm
Mass Screening
Signs and Symptoms
Prognosis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977620301685
work_keys_str_mv AT marthelarsen selfreportedsymptomsamongparticipantsinapopulationbasedscreeningprogram
AT marielilleborge selfreportedsymptomsamongparticipantsinapopulationbasedscreeningprogram
AT einarvigeland selfreportedsymptomsamongparticipantsinapopulationbasedscreeningprogram
AT solveighofvind selfreportedsymptomsamongparticipantsinapopulationbasedscreeningprogram
_version_ 1724373731682287616