Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program
Background: A limited number of studies have explored the association between self-reported symptoms and the risk of breast cancer among participants of population based screening programs. Methods: We performed descriptive statistics on recall, screen-detected and interval cancer, positive predicti...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Breast |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977620301685 |
id |
doaj-ffc98217aeaa4c1ba6239f64dc7bc3be |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ffc98217aeaa4c1ba6239f64dc7bc3be2020-12-23T04:58:34ZengElsevierBreast1532-30802020-12-01545661Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening programMarthe Larsen0Marie Lilleborge1Einar Vigeland2Solveig Hofvind3Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, NorwaySection for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Radiology, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, NorwaySection for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway; Corresponding author. Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, 0304 Oslo, Norway.Background: A limited number of studies have explored the association between self-reported symptoms and the risk of breast cancer among participants of population based screening programs. Methods: We performed descriptive statistics on recall, screen-detected and interval cancer, positive predictive value and histopathological tumour characteristics by symptom group (asymptomatic, lump, and skin or nipple changes) as reported from 785,642 women aged 50–69 when they attended BreastScreen Norway 1996–2016. Uni- and multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between symptom group and screen-detected or interval cancer. Results were presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A lump or skin/nipple change was reported in 6.2% of the 3,307,697 examinations. The rate of screen-detected cancers per 1000 examinations was 45.2 among women with a self-reported lump and 5.1 among asymptomatic women. Adjusted odds ratio of screen-detected cancer was 10.1 (95% CI: 9.3–11.1) and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.6–2.5) for interval cancer among women with a self-reported lump versus asymptomatic women. Tumour diameter, histologic grade and lymph node involvement of screen-detected and interval cancer were less prognostically favourable for women with a self-reported lump versus asymptomatic women. Conclusion: Despite targeting asymptomatic women, 6.2% of the screening examinations in BreastScreen Norway was performed among women who reported a lump or skin/nipple change when they attended screening. The odds ratio of screen-detected cancer was higher for women with versus without symptoms. Standardized follow-up guidelines might be beneficial for screening programs in order to take care of women reporting signs or symptoms of breast cancer when they attend screening.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977620301685Breast neoplasmMass ScreeningSigns and SymptomsPrognosis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marthe Larsen Marie Lilleborge Einar Vigeland Solveig Hofvind |
spellingShingle |
Marthe Larsen Marie Lilleborge Einar Vigeland Solveig Hofvind Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program Breast Breast neoplasm Mass Screening Signs and Symptoms Prognosis |
author_facet |
Marthe Larsen Marie Lilleborge Einar Vigeland Solveig Hofvind |
author_sort |
Marthe Larsen |
title |
Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program |
title_short |
Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program |
title_full |
Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program |
title_fullStr |
Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program |
title_full_unstemmed |
Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program |
title_sort |
self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Breast |
issn |
1532-3080 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Background: A limited number of studies have explored the association between self-reported symptoms and the risk of breast cancer among participants of population based screening programs. Methods: We performed descriptive statistics on recall, screen-detected and interval cancer, positive predictive value and histopathological tumour characteristics by symptom group (asymptomatic, lump, and skin or nipple changes) as reported from 785,642 women aged 50–69 when they attended BreastScreen Norway 1996–2016. Uni- and multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between symptom group and screen-detected or interval cancer. Results were presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A lump or skin/nipple change was reported in 6.2% of the 3,307,697 examinations. The rate of screen-detected cancers per 1000 examinations was 45.2 among women with a self-reported lump and 5.1 among asymptomatic women. Adjusted odds ratio of screen-detected cancer was 10.1 (95% CI: 9.3–11.1) and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.6–2.5) for interval cancer among women with a self-reported lump versus asymptomatic women. Tumour diameter, histologic grade and lymph node involvement of screen-detected and interval cancer were less prognostically favourable for women with a self-reported lump versus asymptomatic women. Conclusion: Despite targeting asymptomatic women, 6.2% of the screening examinations in BreastScreen Norway was performed among women who reported a lump or skin/nipple change when they attended screening. The odds ratio of screen-detected cancer was higher for women with versus without symptoms. Standardized follow-up guidelines might be beneficial for screening programs in order to take care of women reporting signs or symptoms of breast cancer when they attend screening. |
topic |
Breast neoplasm Mass Screening Signs and Symptoms Prognosis |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977620301685 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marthelarsen selfreportedsymptomsamongparticipantsinapopulationbasedscreeningprogram AT marielilleborge selfreportedsymptomsamongparticipantsinapopulationbasedscreeningprogram AT einarvigeland selfreportedsymptomsamongparticipantsinapopulationbasedscreeningprogram AT solveighofvind selfreportedsymptomsamongparticipantsinapopulationbasedscreeningprogram |
_version_ |
1724373731682287616 |