Tempting food words activate eating simulations

This study shows that tempting food words activate simulations of eating the food, including simulations of the taste and texture of the food, simulations of eating situations, and simulations of hedonic enjoyment. In a feature listing task, participants generated features that are typically true o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Esther Katharina Papies
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00838/full
id doaj-ffc6eca07cf549f79927645c1768ec0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ffc6eca07cf549f79927645c1768ec0d2020-11-24T23:58:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782013-11-01410.3389/fpsyg.2013.0083867705Tempting food words activate eating simulationsEsther Katharina Papies0Utrecht UniversityThis study shows that tempting food words activate simulations of eating the food, including simulations of the taste and texture of the food, simulations of eating situations, and simulations of hedonic enjoyment. In a feature listing task, participants generated features that are typically true of four tempting foods (e.g., chips) and four neutral foods (e.g., rice). The resulting features were coded as features of eating simulations if they referred to the taste, texture and temperature of the food (e.g., crunchy; sticky), to situations of eating the food (e.g., movie; good for Wok dishes), and to the hedonic experience when eating the food (e.g., tasty). Based on the grounded cognition perspective, it was predicted that tempting foods are more likely to be represented in terms of actually eating them, so that participants would list more features referring to eating simulations for tempting than for neutral foods. Confirming this hypothesis, results showed that eating simulation features constituted 53% of the features for tempting food, and 26% of the features for neutral food. Visual features, in contrast, were mentioned more often for neutral foods (45%) than for tempting foods (19%). Exploratory analyses revealed that the proportion of eating simulation features for tempting foods was positively correlated with perceived attractiveness of the foods, and negatively with participants’ dieting concerns, suggesting that eating simulations may depend on individuals’ goals with regard to eating. These findings are discussed with regard to their implications for understanding the processes guiding eating behavior, and for interventions designed to reduce the consumption of attractive, unhealthy food.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00838/fullsimulationCognitive Psychologygrounded cognitionSelf-Controlfeature listingtemptation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Esther Katharina Papies
spellingShingle Esther Katharina Papies
Tempting food words activate eating simulations
Frontiers in Psychology
simulation
Cognitive Psychology
grounded cognition
Self-Control
feature listing
temptation
author_facet Esther Katharina Papies
author_sort Esther Katharina Papies
title Tempting food words activate eating simulations
title_short Tempting food words activate eating simulations
title_full Tempting food words activate eating simulations
title_fullStr Tempting food words activate eating simulations
title_full_unstemmed Tempting food words activate eating simulations
title_sort tempting food words activate eating simulations
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2013-11-01
description This study shows that tempting food words activate simulations of eating the food, including simulations of the taste and texture of the food, simulations of eating situations, and simulations of hedonic enjoyment. In a feature listing task, participants generated features that are typically true of four tempting foods (e.g., chips) and four neutral foods (e.g., rice). The resulting features were coded as features of eating simulations if they referred to the taste, texture and temperature of the food (e.g., crunchy; sticky), to situations of eating the food (e.g., movie; good for Wok dishes), and to the hedonic experience when eating the food (e.g., tasty). Based on the grounded cognition perspective, it was predicted that tempting foods are more likely to be represented in terms of actually eating them, so that participants would list more features referring to eating simulations for tempting than for neutral foods. Confirming this hypothesis, results showed that eating simulation features constituted 53% of the features for tempting food, and 26% of the features for neutral food. Visual features, in contrast, were mentioned more often for neutral foods (45%) than for tempting foods (19%). Exploratory analyses revealed that the proportion of eating simulation features for tempting foods was positively correlated with perceived attractiveness of the foods, and negatively with participants’ dieting concerns, suggesting that eating simulations may depend on individuals’ goals with regard to eating. These findings are discussed with regard to their implications for understanding the processes guiding eating behavior, and for interventions designed to reduce the consumption of attractive, unhealthy food.
topic simulation
Cognitive Psychology
grounded cognition
Self-Control
feature listing
temptation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00838/full
work_keys_str_mv AT estherkatharinapapies temptingfoodwordsactivateeatingsimulations
_version_ 1725450001257070592