O meio relativo a nós em Aristóteles
<div>The essential intent of this paper is to elucidate the meaning of the term pros hêmas appearing inside the Aristotelian definition of moral virtue. In this definition, after having established the genus of virtue as a disposition ( hexis), Aristotle offers his...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2007-01-01
|
Series: | Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/17427 |
id |
doaj-ff941ed591ca4992b26447a8e90cb5d2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ff941ed591ca4992b26447a8e90cb5d22021-02-02T06:27:57ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaEthic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy1677-29541677-29542007-01-0161193410.5007/1742714000O meio relativo a nós em AristótelesJoão Hobuss<div>The essential intent of this paper is to elucidate the meaning of the term pros hêmas appearing inside the Aristotelian definition of moral virtue. In this definition, after having established the genus of virtue as a disposition ( hexis), Aristotle offers his specific difference, i.e., being a mean pros hêmas (relative to us). What is the meaning of “relative to us”? Relative to us as specie? Relative to the moral agent? Relative to the character? Every one of these possibilities will be analyzed, in an attempt to</div><div>demonstrate that none of them fulfills the Aristotelian intent, because us in the expression “relative to us” seems to point out to circumstances in which the agent is involved with, what seems to be asserted in several passages of the Nicomachean Ethics</div>https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/17427VirtueMeanCircumstances. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
João Hobuss |
spellingShingle |
João Hobuss O meio relativo a nós em Aristóteles Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy Virtue Mean Circumstances. |
author_facet |
João Hobuss |
author_sort |
João Hobuss |
title |
O meio relativo a nós em Aristóteles |
title_short |
O meio relativo a nós em Aristóteles |
title_full |
O meio relativo a nós em Aristóteles |
title_fullStr |
O meio relativo a nós em Aristóteles |
title_full_unstemmed |
O meio relativo a nós em Aristóteles |
title_sort |
o meio relativo a nós em aristóteles |
publisher |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
series |
Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy |
issn |
1677-2954 1677-2954 |
publishDate |
2007-01-01 |
description |
<div>The essential intent of this paper is to elucidate the meaning of the term pros hêmas appearing inside the Aristotelian definition of moral virtue. In this definition, after having established the genus of virtue as a disposition ( hexis), Aristotle offers his specific difference, i.e., being a mean pros hêmas (relative to us). What is the meaning of “relative to us”? Relative to us as specie? Relative to the moral agent? Relative to the character? Every one of these possibilities will be analyzed, in an attempt to</div><div>demonstrate that none of them fulfills the Aristotelian intent, because us in the expression “relative to us” seems to point out to circumstances in which the agent is involved with, what seems to be asserted in several passages of the Nicomachean Ethics</div> |
topic |
Virtue Mean Circumstances. |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/17427 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT joaohobuss omeiorelativoanosemaristoteles |
_version_ |
1724301366654926848 |