OER impact study perceived by faculty within ODL framework

Design/methodology/approach - An exploratory design is used in this study. Qualitatively, key benefits include integration, opportunity, efficiency, enrichment, and collaboration. These benefits have direct impacts on enhancing student learning, augmenting teaching practice, improving productivity,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maximus Gorky Sembiring
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Publishing 2016-08-01
Series:AAOU Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2016-0021/full/pdf?title=oer-impact-study-perceived-by-faculty-within-odl-framework
id doaj-ff82200710294ed6a7d11f827bfd971b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ff82200710294ed6a7d11f827bfd971b2020-11-25T01:42:17ZengEmerald PublishingAAOU Journal1858-34312414-69942016-08-01111788910.1108/AAOUJ-07-2016-0021584704OER impact study perceived by faculty within ODL frameworkMaximus Gorky Sembiring0Universitas Terbuka, Tangerang Selatan, IndonesiaDesign/methodology/approach - An exploratory design is used in this study. Qualitatively, key benefits include integration, opportunity, efficiency, enrichment, and collaboration. These benefits have direct impacts on enhancing student learning, augmenting teaching practice, improving productivity, catalyzing changes in teaching practice, and supporting non-traditional learners. Quantitatively, the key benefit is moderating the variables. Integration, opportunity, efficiency, enrichment, and collaboration are independent variables. Variables like enhancing student learning, enriching teaching practice, improving productivity, catalyzing changes, and supporting non-traditional learners are the dependent variables. The study population comprised the 721 Universitas Terbuka (UT) faculty members. The respondents were chosen randomly by distributing 450 questionnaires. Only 203 questionnaires were completed. Importance performance analysis and customer satisfaction index (IPA-CSI) were used to measure the importance level of variables involved and their benefits. Structural equation model (SEM) was used to examine the ten hypotheses developed so that the author could understand the significance level and relations power among variables engaged with reference to the qualitative outcomes previously obtained. Findings - Six hypotheses were validated by the analysis. Statistically, efficiency and integration affect key benefits. Likewise, moderating variables affect teaching practice enhancement, productivity improvement, catalyzing changes, and supporting non-traditional learners. Conversely, key benefits were neither interrelated by opportunity, enrichment, and collaboration nor learning enhancement. Practical implications - This study highlighted that adoption, integration, and implementation of OER in the UT milieu do take place. Originality/value - This study recognized the variation of qualitative vs quantitative outcomes. An auxiliary inquiry is needed with broader perspective by increasing the respondents sample in order to minimize the difference between qualitative and quantitative results.https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2016-0021/full/pdf?title=oer-impact-study-perceived-by-faculty-within-odl-frameworkimpact studyexploratory designimportance performance analysis (ipa)open educational resources (oer)structural equation modelling (sem)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maximus Gorky Sembiring
spellingShingle Maximus Gorky Sembiring
OER impact study perceived by faculty within ODL framework
AAOU Journal
impact study
exploratory design
importance performance analysis (ipa)
open educational resources (oer)
structural equation modelling (sem)
author_facet Maximus Gorky Sembiring
author_sort Maximus Gorky Sembiring
title OER impact study perceived by faculty within ODL framework
title_short OER impact study perceived by faculty within ODL framework
title_full OER impact study perceived by faculty within ODL framework
title_fullStr OER impact study perceived by faculty within ODL framework
title_full_unstemmed OER impact study perceived by faculty within ODL framework
title_sort oer impact study perceived by faculty within odl framework
publisher Emerald Publishing
series AAOU Journal
issn 1858-3431
2414-6994
publishDate 2016-08-01
description Design/methodology/approach - An exploratory design is used in this study. Qualitatively, key benefits include integration, opportunity, efficiency, enrichment, and collaboration. These benefits have direct impacts on enhancing student learning, augmenting teaching practice, improving productivity, catalyzing changes in teaching practice, and supporting non-traditional learners. Quantitatively, the key benefit is moderating the variables. Integration, opportunity, efficiency, enrichment, and collaboration are independent variables. Variables like enhancing student learning, enriching teaching practice, improving productivity, catalyzing changes, and supporting non-traditional learners are the dependent variables. The study population comprised the 721 Universitas Terbuka (UT) faculty members. The respondents were chosen randomly by distributing 450 questionnaires. Only 203 questionnaires were completed. Importance performance analysis and customer satisfaction index (IPA-CSI) were used to measure the importance level of variables involved and their benefits. Structural equation model (SEM) was used to examine the ten hypotheses developed so that the author could understand the significance level and relations power among variables engaged with reference to the qualitative outcomes previously obtained. Findings - Six hypotheses were validated by the analysis. Statistically, efficiency and integration affect key benefits. Likewise, moderating variables affect teaching practice enhancement, productivity improvement, catalyzing changes, and supporting non-traditional learners. Conversely, key benefits were neither interrelated by opportunity, enrichment, and collaboration nor learning enhancement. Practical implications - This study highlighted that adoption, integration, and implementation of OER in the UT milieu do take place. Originality/value - This study recognized the variation of qualitative vs quantitative outcomes. An auxiliary inquiry is needed with broader perspective by increasing the respondents sample in order to minimize the difference between qualitative and quantitative results.
topic impact study
exploratory design
importance performance analysis (ipa)
open educational resources (oer)
structural equation modelling (sem)
url https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2016-0021/full/pdf?title=oer-impact-study-perceived-by-faculty-within-odl-framework
work_keys_str_mv AT maximusgorkysembiring oerimpactstudyperceivedbyfacultywithinodlframework
_version_ 1725037534534172672