US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses
Purpose: To evaluate the impact that the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have had on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we compared the incidence and distribution of new cases diagnosed in 2011-before the USPSTF PSA screening recomm...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Urological Association
2017-11-01
|
Series: | Investigative and Clinical Urology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://synapse.koreamed.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2020ICU/icu-58-423.pdf |
id |
doaj-ff7b13275b844831b8805568b06a79f8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ff7b13275b844831b8805568b06a79f82020-11-24T21:10:52ZengKorean Urological AssociationInvestigative and Clinical Urology2466-04932466-054X2017-11-0158642342810.4111/icu.2017.58.6.423US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnosesGlen Gejerman0Patrick Ciccone1Martin Goldstein2Vincent Lanteri3Burton Schlecker4John Sanzone5Michael Esposito6Sergey Rome7Michael Ciccone8Eric Margolis9Robert Simon10Yijun Guo11Sri-Ram Pentakota12Hossein Sadhegi-Nejad13New Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USANew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USANew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USANew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USANew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USANew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USANew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USANew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USANew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USANew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USANew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USANew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USADivision of Urology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Bloomfield, NJ, USANew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USAPurpose: To evaluate the impact that the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have had on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we compared the incidence and distribution of new cases diagnosed in 2011-before the USPSTF PSA screening recommendations versus 2014 at which time the guidelines were widely adopted. Materials and Methods: We identified all prostate biopsies performed by a large urology group practice utilizing a centralized pathology lab. We examined total biopsies performed, percentage of positive biopsies, and for those with positive biopsies examined for differences in patient age, PSA, and Gleason score. Results: A total of 4,178 biopsies were identified – 2,513 in 2011 and 1,665 in 2014. The percentage of positive biopsies was 27% in 2011 versus 34% in 2014 (p<0.0001). Among patients with positive biopsies, we found statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts in the median ages and Gleason scores. Patients were about 1 year younger in 2014 compared to 2011 (t-test; p=0.043). High Gleason scores (8–10) were diagnosed in 19% of the 2014 positive biopsies versus 9% in the 2011 positive biopsies (chi square; p<0.0001). Conclusions: After the widespread implementation of the 2011 USPTF PSA screening guidelines, 34% fewer biopsies were performed with a 29% increase in positive biopsy rates. We found a significantly higher incidence of high grade disease in 2014 compared with 2011. The percentage of patients with positive biopsies having Gleason scores 8–10 more than doubled in 2014. The higher incidence of these more aggressive cancers must be part of the discussion regarding PSA screening.https://synapse.koreamed.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2020ICU/icu-58-423.pdfDiagnosisGleason scoreProstate neoplasms |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Glen Gejerman Patrick Ciccone Martin Goldstein Vincent Lanteri Burton Schlecker John Sanzone Michael Esposito Sergey Rome Michael Ciccone Eric Margolis Robert Simon Yijun Guo Sri-Ram Pentakota Hossein Sadhegi-Nejad |
spellingShingle |
Glen Gejerman Patrick Ciccone Martin Goldstein Vincent Lanteri Burton Schlecker John Sanzone Michael Esposito Sergey Rome Michael Ciccone Eric Margolis Robert Simon Yijun Guo Sri-Ram Pentakota Hossein Sadhegi-Nejad US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses Investigative and Clinical Urology Diagnosis Gleason score Prostate neoplasms |
author_facet |
Glen Gejerman Patrick Ciccone Martin Goldstein Vincent Lanteri Burton Schlecker John Sanzone Michael Esposito Sergey Rome Michael Ciccone Eric Margolis Robert Simon Yijun Guo Sri-Ram Pentakota Hossein Sadhegi-Nejad |
author_sort |
Glen Gejerman |
title |
US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses |
title_short |
US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses |
title_full |
US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses |
title_fullStr |
US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses |
title_full_unstemmed |
US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses |
title_sort |
us preventive services task force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher gleason score diagnoses |
publisher |
Korean Urological Association |
series |
Investigative and Clinical Urology |
issn |
2466-0493 2466-054X |
publishDate |
2017-11-01 |
description |
Purpose: To evaluate the impact that the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have had on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we compared the incidence and distribution of new cases diagnosed in 2011-before the USPSTF PSA screening recommendations versus 2014 at which time the guidelines were widely adopted. Materials and Methods: We identified all prostate biopsies performed by a large urology group practice utilizing a centralized pathology lab. We examined total biopsies performed, percentage of positive biopsies, and for those with positive biopsies examined for differences in patient age, PSA, and Gleason score. Results: A total of 4,178 biopsies were identified – 2,513 in 2011 and 1,665 in 2014. The percentage of positive biopsies was 27% in 2011 versus 34% in 2014 (p<0.0001). Among patients with positive biopsies, we found statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts in the median ages and Gleason scores. Patients were about 1 year younger in 2014 compared to 2011 (t-test; p=0.043). High Gleason scores (8–10) were diagnosed in 19% of the 2014 positive biopsies versus 9% in the 2011 positive biopsies (chi square; p<0.0001). Conclusions: After the widespread implementation of the 2011 USPTF PSA screening guidelines, 34% fewer biopsies were performed with a 29% increase in positive biopsy rates. We found a significantly higher incidence of high grade disease in 2014 compared with 2011. The percentage of patients with positive biopsies having Gleason scores 8–10 more than doubled in 2014. The higher incidence of these more aggressive cancers must be part of the discussion regarding PSA screening. |
topic |
Diagnosis Gleason score Prostate neoplasms |
url |
https://synapse.koreamed.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2020ICU/icu-58-423.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT glengejerman uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT patrickciccone uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT martingoldstein uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT vincentlanteri uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT burtonschlecker uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT johnsanzone uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT michaelesposito uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT sergeyrome uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT michaelciccone uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT ericmargolis uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT robertsimon uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT yijunguo uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT srirampentakota uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses AT hosseinsadheginejad uspreventiveservicestaskforceprostatespecificantigenscreeningguidelinesresultinhighergleasonscorediagnoses |
_version_ |
1716754889635266560 |