Property and politics in and after socialism
This essay synthesizes work on the property regime of Soviet-type societies, using examples from Romania. Its aim is to correct the assumption common among western economists and policy-makers that there was no property in socialist societies (see, e.g., Frydman and Rapaczynski) and therefore no obs...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Romanian Academy
2008-01-01
|
Series: | Revista Română de Sociologie |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.revistadesociologie.ro/pdf-uri/nr1-2-2008/02-VERDERY.pdf |
id |
doaj-ff5f410b7e504e2bade44e0962b2d0fb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ff5f410b7e504e2bade44e0962b2d0fb2020-11-25T00:04:21ZengRomanian AcademyRevista Română de Sociologie1224-92622008-01-01191-23755Property and politics in and after socialismKatherine VerderyThis essay synthesizes work on the property regime of Soviet-type societies, using examples from Romania. Its aim is to correct the assumption common among western economists and policy-makers that there was no property in socialist societies (see, e.g., Frydman and Rapaczynski) and therefore no obstacles to privatization. On the contrary, socialist property was clearly articulated, and its organization had strong implications for how socialist firms might be privatized. Thus, what looked like a "property vacuum" to western advisors proved to be very full of property rules and relations, which impeded satisfactory privatization even years after the collapse of communist parties. http://www.revistadesociologie.ro/pdf-uri/nr1-2-2008/02-VERDERY.pdfsocialismpropertyprivatization |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Katherine Verdery |
spellingShingle |
Katherine Verdery Property and politics in and after socialism Revista Română de Sociologie socialism property privatization |
author_facet |
Katherine Verdery |
author_sort |
Katherine Verdery |
title |
Property and politics in and after socialism |
title_short |
Property and politics in and after socialism |
title_full |
Property and politics in and after socialism |
title_fullStr |
Property and politics in and after socialism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Property and politics in and after socialism |
title_sort |
property and politics in and after socialism |
publisher |
Romanian Academy |
series |
Revista Română de Sociologie |
issn |
1224-9262 |
publishDate |
2008-01-01 |
description |
This essay synthesizes work on the property regime of Soviet-type societies, using examples from Romania. Its aim is to correct the assumption common among western economists and policy-makers that there was no property in socialist societies (see, e.g., Frydman and Rapaczynski) and therefore no obstacles to privatization. On the contrary, socialist property was clearly articulated, and its organization had strong implications for how socialist firms might be privatized. Thus, what looked like a "property vacuum" to western advisors proved to be very full of property rules and relations, which impeded satisfactory privatization even years after the collapse of communist parties. |
topic |
socialism property privatization |
url |
http://www.revistadesociologie.ro/pdf-uri/nr1-2-2008/02-VERDERY.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT katherineverdery propertyandpoliticsinandaftersocialism |
_version_ |
1725429947561934848 |