Property and politics in and after socialism

This essay synthesizes work on the property regime of Soviet-type societies, using examples from Romania. Its aim is to correct the assumption common among western economists and policy-makers that there was no property in socialist societies (see, e.g., Frydman and Rapaczynski) and therefore no obs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katherine Verdery
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Romanian Academy 2008-01-01
Series:Revista Română de Sociologie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revistadesociologie.ro/pdf-uri/nr1-2-2008/02-VERDERY.pdf
id doaj-ff5f410b7e504e2bade44e0962b2d0fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ff5f410b7e504e2bade44e0962b2d0fb2020-11-25T00:04:21ZengRomanian AcademyRevista Română de Sociologie1224-92622008-01-01191-23755Property and politics in and after socialismKatherine VerderyThis essay synthesizes work on the property regime of Soviet-type societies, using examples from Romania. Its aim is to correct the assumption common among western economists and policy-makers that there was no property in socialist societies (see, e.g., Frydman and Rapaczynski) and therefore no obstacles to privatization. On the contrary, socialist property was clearly articulated, and its organization had strong implications for how socialist firms might be privatized. Thus, what looked like a "property vacuum" to western advisors proved to be very full of property rules and relations, which impeded satisfactory privatization even years after the collapse of communist parties. http://www.revistadesociologie.ro/pdf-uri/nr1-2-2008/02-VERDERY.pdfsocialismpropertyprivatization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katherine Verdery
spellingShingle Katherine Verdery
Property and politics in and after socialism
Revista Română de Sociologie
socialism
property
privatization
author_facet Katherine Verdery
author_sort Katherine Verdery
title Property and politics in and after socialism
title_short Property and politics in and after socialism
title_full Property and politics in and after socialism
title_fullStr Property and politics in and after socialism
title_full_unstemmed Property and politics in and after socialism
title_sort property and politics in and after socialism
publisher Romanian Academy
series Revista Română de Sociologie
issn 1224-9262
publishDate 2008-01-01
description This essay synthesizes work on the property regime of Soviet-type societies, using examples from Romania. Its aim is to correct the assumption common among western economists and policy-makers that there was no property in socialist societies (see, e.g., Frydman and Rapaczynski) and therefore no obstacles to privatization. On the contrary, socialist property was clearly articulated, and its organization had strong implications for how socialist firms might be privatized. Thus, what looked like a "property vacuum" to western advisors proved to be very full of property rules and relations, which impeded satisfactory privatization even years after the collapse of communist parties.
topic socialism
property
privatization
url http://www.revistadesociologie.ro/pdf-uri/nr1-2-2008/02-VERDERY.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT katherineverdery propertyandpoliticsinandaftersocialism
_version_ 1725429947561934848