Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow

Atmospheric pressure changes ranging from high-amplitude, low-frequency events caused by synoptic weather systems to smaller amplitude, high-frequency events caused by turbulence penetrate permeable snow surfaces. Fluxes driven by these pressure changes augment non-radiative processes that filter at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen A. Drake, John S. Selker, Chad W. Higgins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Earth Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feart.2019.00201/full
id doaj-ff5ef10fdd4b4927a79ca6f24c2b6e1e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ff5ef10fdd4b4927a79ca6f24c2b6e1e2020-11-25T00:50:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Earth Science2296-64632019-08-01710.3389/feart.2019.00201443391Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface SnowStephen A. Drake0John S. Selker1Chad W. Higgins2Department of Physics, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, United StatesDepartment of Biological and Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United StatesDepartment of Biological and Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United StatesAtmospheric pressure changes ranging from high-amplitude, low-frequency events caused by synoptic weather systems to smaller amplitude, high-frequency events caused by turbulence penetrate permeable snow surfaces. Fluxes driven by these pressure changes augment non-radiative processes that filter atmospheric aerosols and drive near-surface vapor flux by sublimation, condensation and deposition. We report on field experiments in which we measured the amplitude of mid-to-high frequency pressure changes as they varied with depth in a seasonal snowpack and on two empirical models that distinguish conditions that promote pressure-driven vapor exchange. We found that the standard deviation of pressure changes poorly characterizes pressure perturbation amplitudes that drive vapor exchange because many low amplitude perturbations mask the influence of less common but more consequential high amplitude perturbations. Spectral analysis of pressure perturbation energy at different snow depths revealed an empirical formula that quantifies perturbation pressure attenuation as a function of frequency and depth in snow. Model results indicated that sublimation enhancement is maximized for perturbation pressure periods between 0.2 and 10 s.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feart.2019.00201/fullsnowvaporexchangesublimationpressureperturbation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephen A. Drake
John S. Selker
Chad W. Higgins
spellingShingle Stephen A. Drake
John S. Selker
Chad W. Higgins
Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow
Frontiers in Earth Science
snow
vapor
exchange
sublimation
pressure
perturbation
author_facet Stephen A. Drake
John S. Selker
Chad W. Higgins
author_sort Stephen A. Drake
title Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow
title_short Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow
title_full Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow
title_fullStr Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow
title_full_unstemmed Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow
title_sort pressure-driven vapor exchange with surface snow
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Earth Science
issn 2296-6463
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Atmospheric pressure changes ranging from high-amplitude, low-frequency events caused by synoptic weather systems to smaller amplitude, high-frequency events caused by turbulence penetrate permeable snow surfaces. Fluxes driven by these pressure changes augment non-radiative processes that filter atmospheric aerosols and drive near-surface vapor flux by sublimation, condensation and deposition. We report on field experiments in which we measured the amplitude of mid-to-high frequency pressure changes as they varied with depth in a seasonal snowpack and on two empirical models that distinguish conditions that promote pressure-driven vapor exchange. We found that the standard deviation of pressure changes poorly characterizes pressure perturbation amplitudes that drive vapor exchange because many low amplitude perturbations mask the influence of less common but more consequential high amplitude perturbations. Spectral analysis of pressure perturbation energy at different snow depths revealed an empirical formula that quantifies perturbation pressure attenuation as a function of frequency and depth in snow. Model results indicated that sublimation enhancement is maximized for perturbation pressure periods between 0.2 and 10 s.
topic snow
vapor
exchange
sublimation
pressure
perturbation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feart.2019.00201/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenadrake pressuredrivenvaporexchangewithsurfacesnow
AT johnsselker pressuredrivenvaporexchangewithsurfacesnow
AT chadwhiggins pressuredrivenvaporexchangewithsurfacesnow
_version_ 1725248778177347584