Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow
Atmospheric pressure changes ranging from high-amplitude, low-frequency events caused by synoptic weather systems to smaller amplitude, high-frequency events caused by turbulence penetrate permeable snow surfaces. Fluxes driven by these pressure changes augment non-radiative processes that filter at...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Earth Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feart.2019.00201/full |
id |
doaj-ff5ef10fdd4b4927a79ca6f24c2b6e1e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ff5ef10fdd4b4927a79ca6f24c2b6e1e2020-11-25T00:50:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Earth Science2296-64632019-08-01710.3389/feart.2019.00201443391Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface SnowStephen A. Drake0John S. Selker1Chad W. Higgins2Department of Physics, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, United StatesDepartment of Biological and Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United StatesDepartment of Biological and Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United StatesAtmospheric pressure changes ranging from high-amplitude, low-frequency events caused by synoptic weather systems to smaller amplitude, high-frequency events caused by turbulence penetrate permeable snow surfaces. Fluxes driven by these pressure changes augment non-radiative processes that filter atmospheric aerosols and drive near-surface vapor flux by sublimation, condensation and deposition. We report on field experiments in which we measured the amplitude of mid-to-high frequency pressure changes as they varied with depth in a seasonal snowpack and on two empirical models that distinguish conditions that promote pressure-driven vapor exchange. We found that the standard deviation of pressure changes poorly characterizes pressure perturbation amplitudes that drive vapor exchange because many low amplitude perturbations mask the influence of less common but more consequential high amplitude perturbations. Spectral analysis of pressure perturbation energy at different snow depths revealed an empirical formula that quantifies perturbation pressure attenuation as a function of frequency and depth in snow. Model results indicated that sublimation enhancement is maximized for perturbation pressure periods between 0.2 and 10 s.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feart.2019.00201/fullsnowvaporexchangesublimationpressureperturbation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stephen A. Drake John S. Selker Chad W. Higgins |
spellingShingle |
Stephen A. Drake John S. Selker Chad W. Higgins Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow Frontiers in Earth Science snow vapor exchange sublimation pressure perturbation |
author_facet |
Stephen A. Drake John S. Selker Chad W. Higgins |
author_sort |
Stephen A. Drake |
title |
Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow |
title_short |
Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow |
title_full |
Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow |
title_fullStr |
Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pressure-Driven Vapor Exchange With Surface Snow |
title_sort |
pressure-driven vapor exchange with surface snow |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Earth Science |
issn |
2296-6463 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
Atmospheric pressure changes ranging from high-amplitude, low-frequency events caused by synoptic weather systems to smaller amplitude, high-frequency events caused by turbulence penetrate permeable snow surfaces. Fluxes driven by these pressure changes augment non-radiative processes that filter atmospheric aerosols and drive near-surface vapor flux by sublimation, condensation and deposition. We report on field experiments in which we measured the amplitude of mid-to-high frequency pressure changes as they varied with depth in a seasonal snowpack and on two empirical models that distinguish conditions that promote pressure-driven vapor exchange. We found that the standard deviation of pressure changes poorly characterizes pressure perturbation amplitudes that drive vapor exchange because many low amplitude perturbations mask the influence of less common but more consequential high amplitude perturbations. Spectral analysis of pressure perturbation energy at different snow depths revealed an empirical formula that quantifies perturbation pressure attenuation as a function of frequency and depth in snow. Model results indicated that sublimation enhancement is maximized for perturbation pressure periods between 0.2 and 10 s. |
topic |
snow vapor exchange sublimation pressure perturbation |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feart.2019.00201/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stephenadrake pressuredrivenvaporexchangewithsurfacesnow AT johnsselker pressuredrivenvaporexchangewithsurfacesnow AT chadwhiggins pressuredrivenvaporexchangewithsurfacesnow |
_version_ |
1725248778177347584 |