Core Endurance Relationships With Athletic and Functional Performance in Inactive People

Research regarding the relationship between core muscle endurance and performance is limited. The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between core/trunk endurance and athletic performance. Seventy-four healthy participants between 18 and 45 years old participated in this study (Age:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marta Silva Santos, David G. Behm, David Barbado, Josimari Melo DeSantana, Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01490/full
id doaj-ff4c00c283da459eb9b952f6043be3f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ff4c00c283da459eb9b952f6043be3f22020-11-25T01:38:57ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2019-12-011010.3389/fphys.2019.01490480367Core Endurance Relationships With Athletic and Functional Performance in Inactive PeopleMarta Silva Santos0David G. Behm1David Barbado2Josimari Melo DeSantana3Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto4Physical Education Department, Functional Training Group, Graduate Program in Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, BrazilSchool of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NF, CanadaSport Research Centre, Department of Sport Sciences, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, SpainNeuroscience Research Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, Graduate Program in Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, BrazilPhysical Education Department, Functional Training Group, Graduate Program in Physiological Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, BrazilResearch regarding the relationship between core muscle endurance and performance is limited. The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between core/trunk endurance and athletic performance. Seventy-four healthy participants between 18 and 45 years old participated in this study (Age: 26.0 ± 6.5 years; Mass: 74.6 ± 12.8 kg; Height: 1.74 ± 0.08 m; BMI: 19.0 ± 6.8 kg/m2). The core endurance was measured using the McGill protocol, consisting of the following tests: trunk flexion, back extension, and side-bridge. Functional performance was evaluated with push-ups, sit to stand, T-run test, countermovement jump (CMJ), Yo-Yo test, maximum dynamic strength-one repetition maximum (1RM) and muscle power on the bench press, pull row, and leg press. The regression results between the McGill protocol (proxy for core/trunk endurance) and the dependent variables were: 1RM pull row: r2 = 0.109 with p = 0.046; RM bench press: r2 = 0.149 with p = 0.012; RM leg press: r2 = 0.144 with p = 0.013 and power pull row: r2 = 0.151 with p = 0.016; power bench press: r2 = 0.136 with p = 0.026; power leg press: r2 = 0.122 with p = 0.013), push-ups: r2 = 0.157 with p < 0.001, sit to stand: r2 = 0.198 with p < 0,001), functional movement score: r2 = 0.209 with p < 0.001). Nevertheless, core endurance scores were not able to predict jump ability (r2 = 0.014, p = 0.807) or agility (T-test: 0.036 with p = 0.497). In conclusion, core endurance exerted no significant influence the agility and jump performance but influenced the ability to run intermittently, exert maximum power and strength in different actions (push, pull, and lift exercises) related to the better quality of movement (FMS).https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01490/fullchronic low back painathletic performancerehabilitationtorsomuscles
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marta Silva Santos
David G. Behm
David Barbado
Josimari Melo DeSantana
Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto
spellingShingle Marta Silva Santos
David G. Behm
David Barbado
Josimari Melo DeSantana
Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto
Core Endurance Relationships With Athletic and Functional Performance in Inactive People
Frontiers in Physiology
chronic low back pain
athletic performance
rehabilitation
torso
muscles
author_facet Marta Silva Santos
David G. Behm
David Barbado
Josimari Melo DeSantana
Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto
author_sort Marta Silva Santos
title Core Endurance Relationships With Athletic and Functional Performance in Inactive People
title_short Core Endurance Relationships With Athletic and Functional Performance in Inactive People
title_full Core Endurance Relationships With Athletic and Functional Performance in Inactive People
title_fullStr Core Endurance Relationships With Athletic and Functional Performance in Inactive People
title_full_unstemmed Core Endurance Relationships With Athletic and Functional Performance in Inactive People
title_sort core endurance relationships with athletic and functional performance in inactive people
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Physiology
issn 1664-042X
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Research regarding the relationship between core muscle endurance and performance is limited. The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between core/trunk endurance and athletic performance. Seventy-four healthy participants between 18 and 45 years old participated in this study (Age: 26.0 ± 6.5 years; Mass: 74.6 ± 12.8 kg; Height: 1.74 ± 0.08 m; BMI: 19.0 ± 6.8 kg/m2). The core endurance was measured using the McGill protocol, consisting of the following tests: trunk flexion, back extension, and side-bridge. Functional performance was evaluated with push-ups, sit to stand, T-run test, countermovement jump (CMJ), Yo-Yo test, maximum dynamic strength-one repetition maximum (1RM) and muscle power on the bench press, pull row, and leg press. The regression results between the McGill protocol (proxy for core/trunk endurance) and the dependent variables were: 1RM pull row: r2 = 0.109 with p = 0.046; RM bench press: r2 = 0.149 with p = 0.012; RM leg press: r2 = 0.144 with p = 0.013 and power pull row: r2 = 0.151 with p = 0.016; power bench press: r2 = 0.136 with p = 0.026; power leg press: r2 = 0.122 with p = 0.013), push-ups: r2 = 0.157 with p < 0.001, sit to stand: r2 = 0.198 with p < 0,001), functional movement score: r2 = 0.209 with p < 0.001). Nevertheless, core endurance scores were not able to predict jump ability (r2 = 0.014, p = 0.807) or agility (T-test: 0.036 with p = 0.497). In conclusion, core endurance exerted no significant influence the agility and jump performance but influenced the ability to run intermittently, exert maximum power and strength in different actions (push, pull, and lift exercises) related to the better quality of movement (FMS).
topic chronic low back pain
athletic performance
rehabilitation
torso
muscles
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01490/full
work_keys_str_mv AT martasilvasantos coreendurancerelationshipswithathleticandfunctionalperformanceininactivepeople
AT davidgbehm coreendurancerelationshipswithathleticandfunctionalperformanceininactivepeople
AT davidbarbado coreendurancerelationshipswithathleticandfunctionalperformanceininactivepeople
AT josimarimelodesantana coreendurancerelationshipswithathleticandfunctionalperformanceininactivepeople
AT marzoedirdasilvagrigoletto coreendurancerelationshipswithathleticandfunctionalperformanceininactivepeople
_version_ 1725051206335725568