Rebooting “Failed” Family-Based Treatment

Family-based treatment (FBT) has become well established as the first-line evidence-based treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. However, fidelity to the FBT model can be poor, and treatment is often augmented or modified in various untested forms in the hope of increasing its effectivenes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kellie R. Lavender
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00068/full
id doaj-ff3d2d14b0de4bdcbf75e7bfbdacc9e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ff3d2d14b0de4bdcbf75e7bfbdacc9e72020-11-25T03:30:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402020-03-011110.3389/fpsyt.2020.00068504357Rebooting “Failed” Family-Based TreatmentKellie R. LavenderFamily-based treatment (FBT) has become well established as the first-line evidence-based treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. However, fidelity to the FBT model can be poor, and treatment is often augmented or modified in various untested forms in the hope of increasing its effectiveness and acceptability. The New Zealand Eating Disorders Clinic, a private specialist outpatient clinic in New Zealand, has been seeing increasing numbers of families presenting for treatment reporting an experience of “failed FBT”. All of the families who presented with a child under the age 19 living at home agreed to restart FBT with the author when re-engaging in treatment. This essay summarizes the experience of the author in repeating FBT with previously “failed” FBT cases over 20 months between 2017 and 2019. Common themes of the first course of FBT were identified that raised questions for the author as to whether FBT had been implemented with sufficient fidelity and proficiency the first time around. This clinical perspective essay describes how these identified issues were addressed when FBT was administered again. It does not intend to make broad claims, but instead is intended to be helpful to clinicians who are implementing FBT, to assist them in carefully examining and assessing whether key FBT principles and procedures have been exhausted before evaluating the need for modification or augmentation. Furthermore, this perspective provides suggestions as to how the identified common themes can be addressed if families re-present for FBT treatment after having had a course of “failed FBT”.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00068/fullfamily-based treatmentanorexia nervosaadolescentstreatment fidelityfailed FBTmodified FBT
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kellie R. Lavender
spellingShingle Kellie R. Lavender
Rebooting “Failed” Family-Based Treatment
Frontiers in Psychiatry
family-based treatment
anorexia nervosa
adolescents
treatment fidelity
failed FBT
modified FBT
author_facet Kellie R. Lavender
author_sort Kellie R. Lavender
title Rebooting “Failed” Family-Based Treatment
title_short Rebooting “Failed” Family-Based Treatment
title_full Rebooting “Failed” Family-Based Treatment
title_fullStr Rebooting “Failed” Family-Based Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Rebooting “Failed” Family-Based Treatment
title_sort rebooting “failed” family-based treatment
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
issn 1664-0640
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Family-based treatment (FBT) has become well established as the first-line evidence-based treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. However, fidelity to the FBT model can be poor, and treatment is often augmented or modified in various untested forms in the hope of increasing its effectiveness and acceptability. The New Zealand Eating Disorders Clinic, a private specialist outpatient clinic in New Zealand, has been seeing increasing numbers of families presenting for treatment reporting an experience of “failed FBT”. All of the families who presented with a child under the age 19 living at home agreed to restart FBT with the author when re-engaging in treatment. This essay summarizes the experience of the author in repeating FBT with previously “failed” FBT cases over 20 months between 2017 and 2019. Common themes of the first course of FBT were identified that raised questions for the author as to whether FBT had been implemented with sufficient fidelity and proficiency the first time around. This clinical perspective essay describes how these identified issues were addressed when FBT was administered again. It does not intend to make broad claims, but instead is intended to be helpful to clinicians who are implementing FBT, to assist them in carefully examining and assessing whether key FBT principles and procedures have been exhausted before evaluating the need for modification or augmentation. Furthermore, this perspective provides suggestions as to how the identified common themes can be addressed if families re-present for FBT treatment after having had a course of “failed FBT”.
topic family-based treatment
anorexia nervosa
adolescents
treatment fidelity
failed FBT
modified FBT
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00068/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kellierlavender rebootingfailedfamilybasedtreatment
_version_ 1724574755295592448