Piotr Chmielowski’s arguments against poets and poetry (as presented in “Zarys literatury z ostatnich lat szesnastu”)

The article discusses the arguments against poetry that were used in Piotr Chmielowski’s <em>Zarys literatury polskiej z ostatnich lat szesnastu </em>[An outline of the literature of the last sixteen years] by its author. The critic’s intention was to diminish the significance of poetry...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wiesław Ratajczak
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Published: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne WFPiK UAM; Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk 2012-01-01
Series:Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Literacka
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pspsl/article/view/2234
id doaj-ff2dd9eded554440bd64fa4499d3db81
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ff2dd9eded554440bd64fa4499d3db812020-11-24T23:05:54ZpolWydawnictwo Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne WFPiK UAM; Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół NaukPoznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Literacka1233-86802450-49472012-01-01019758410.14746/pspsl.2012.19.52207Piotr Chmielowski’s arguments against poets and poetry (as presented in “Zarys literatury z ostatnich lat szesnastu”)Wiesław RatajczakThe article discusses the arguments against poetry that were used in Piotr Chmielowski’s <em>Zarys literatury polskiej z ostatnich lat szesnastu </em>[An outline of the literature of the last sixteen years] by its author. The critic’s intention was to diminish the significance of poetry and, in effect, to push poetry to the margin of literary life. To achieve that, Chmielowski presented a number of examples where modern poetry was not capable of grappling with the problems and challenges of the modern world. Chmielowski also instilled a vision in which writing poems itself appeared to be atavistic and as a relic of an earlier stage of evolution. Since lyric poetry made a particular core of literature, to challenge its position in literature in the name of progress made it possible to question all traditional “authorities”. The author of <em>Zarys </em>indicated examples testifying to the vitality of the novel and future possibilities in the development of this particular genre, whereas his formulated accusations against poetry and poets included their general bad condition (physical, mental and psychical). In addition, Chmielowski accused poetry of insincerity and untruthfulness. With regard to the poetics of the discussed poems, Chmielowski just limited himself to briefly formulated allegations and objections of their rhetoricality and epigonic character.http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pspsl/article/view/2234literary criticismpoetryprogressutilitarianismevolutionism
collection DOAJ
language Polish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wiesław Ratajczak
spellingShingle Wiesław Ratajczak
Piotr Chmielowski’s arguments against poets and poetry (as presented in “Zarys literatury z ostatnich lat szesnastu”)
Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Literacka
literary criticism
poetry
progress
utilitarianism
evolutionism
author_facet Wiesław Ratajczak
author_sort Wiesław Ratajczak
title Piotr Chmielowski’s arguments against poets and poetry (as presented in “Zarys literatury z ostatnich lat szesnastu”)
title_short Piotr Chmielowski’s arguments against poets and poetry (as presented in “Zarys literatury z ostatnich lat szesnastu”)
title_full Piotr Chmielowski’s arguments against poets and poetry (as presented in “Zarys literatury z ostatnich lat szesnastu”)
title_fullStr Piotr Chmielowski’s arguments against poets and poetry (as presented in “Zarys literatury z ostatnich lat szesnastu”)
title_full_unstemmed Piotr Chmielowski’s arguments against poets and poetry (as presented in “Zarys literatury z ostatnich lat szesnastu”)
title_sort piotr chmielowski’s arguments against poets and poetry (as presented in “zarys literatury z ostatnich lat szesnastu”)
publisher Wydawnictwo Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne WFPiK UAM; Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk
series Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Literacka
issn 1233-8680
2450-4947
publishDate 2012-01-01
description The article discusses the arguments against poetry that were used in Piotr Chmielowski’s <em>Zarys literatury polskiej z ostatnich lat szesnastu </em>[An outline of the literature of the last sixteen years] by its author. The critic’s intention was to diminish the significance of poetry and, in effect, to push poetry to the margin of literary life. To achieve that, Chmielowski presented a number of examples where modern poetry was not capable of grappling with the problems and challenges of the modern world. Chmielowski also instilled a vision in which writing poems itself appeared to be atavistic and as a relic of an earlier stage of evolution. Since lyric poetry made a particular core of literature, to challenge its position in literature in the name of progress made it possible to question all traditional “authorities”. The author of <em>Zarys </em>indicated examples testifying to the vitality of the novel and future possibilities in the development of this particular genre, whereas his formulated accusations against poetry and poets included their general bad condition (physical, mental and psychical). In addition, Chmielowski accused poetry of insincerity and untruthfulness. With regard to the poetics of the discussed poems, Chmielowski just limited himself to briefly formulated allegations and objections of their rhetoricality and epigonic character.
topic literary criticism
poetry
progress
utilitarianism
evolutionism
url http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pspsl/article/view/2234
work_keys_str_mv AT wiesławratajczak piotrchmielowskisargumentsagainstpoetsandpoetryaspresentedinzarysliteraturyzostatnichlatszesnastu
_version_ 1725625079059972096