Why Luck Egalitarianism Fails in Condemning Oppression
Luck egalitarianism has been criticized for (1) condoning some cases of oppression and (2) condemning others for the wrong reason—namely, that the victims were not responsible for their oppression. Oppression is unjust, however, the criticism says, regardless of whether victims are responsible for...
Main Author: | Cynthia A. Stark |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Western Ontario
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Feminist Philosophy Quarterly |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/fpq/article/view/8101 |
Similar Items
-
Luck egalitarianism and educational equality.
by: Calvert, John Sinclair
Published: (2015) -
Can We Really Claim ‘Full Responsibility’? The Problem With Normative Luck Egalitarianism in a Luck-Pervasive World
by: Ho, Emilie
Published: (2016) -
Costly choices: gender and luck egalitarianism
by: Byrnes, Emma
Published: (2016) -
Immigrants, Multiculturalism, and Expensive Cultural Tastes: Quong on Luck Egalitarianism and Cultural Minority Rights
by: Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen
Published: (2011-11-01) -
Luck and the Limits of Equality
by: Jeffers, Matthew
Published: (2017)