Regular Solutions in Vacuum Brans-Dicke Theory Compared to Vacuum Einstein Theory
We will confront some static spherically symmetric vacuum Brans-Dicke solutions in the Jordan and Einstein Frames with the Robertson parameters. While the regular solution in the vacuum Einstein theory is just the Schwarzschild black hole, the same in the Jordan frame Brans-Dicke theory is shown to...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in High Energy Physics |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/367029 |
id |
doaj-fef854f6fa4a4ed2849e46b37cd6a73b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fef854f6fa4a4ed2849e46b37cd6a73b2020-11-24T21:13:30ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in High Energy Physics1687-73571687-73652013-01-01201310.1155/2013/367029367029Regular Solutions in Vacuum Brans-Dicke Theory Compared to Vacuum Einstein TheoryAlina Khaybullina0Ramil Izmailov1Kamal K. Nandi2Carlo Cattani3Ya.B. Zel'dovich International Center for Astrophysics, BSPU, Ufa 450000, RussiaYa.B. Zel'dovich International Center for Astrophysics, BSPU, Ufa 450000, RussiaYa.B. Zel'dovich International Center for Astrophysics, BSPU, Ufa 450000, RussiaYa.B. Zel'dovich International Center for Astrophysics, BSPU, Ufa 450000, RussiaWe will confront some static spherically symmetric vacuum Brans-Dicke solutions in the Jordan and Einstein Frames with the Robertson parameters. While the regular solution in the vacuum Einstein theory is just the Schwarzschild black hole, the same in the Jordan frame Brans-Dicke theory is shown to represent not a black hole but a traversable wormhole. But, in this case, the valid range of ω becomes too narrow to yield the observed weak field Robertson parameters at the positive mass mouth. The corresponding solution in the Einstein frame also provides a regular wormhole, and it yields the correct parametric values but only up to “one and half order.” We argue that a second-order contribution can in principle distinguish between the signatures of the regular wormhole and the singular Buchdahl solution in the Einstein frame. Thus, at the level of regular solutions, Brans-Dicke theory in each frame predicts effects very different from those of Einstein's theory. To our knowledge, these theoretical distinctions seem not to have received adequate attention so far.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/367029 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alina Khaybullina Ramil Izmailov Kamal K. Nandi Carlo Cattani |
spellingShingle |
Alina Khaybullina Ramil Izmailov Kamal K. Nandi Carlo Cattani Regular Solutions in Vacuum Brans-Dicke Theory Compared to Vacuum Einstein Theory Advances in High Energy Physics |
author_facet |
Alina Khaybullina Ramil Izmailov Kamal K. Nandi Carlo Cattani |
author_sort |
Alina Khaybullina |
title |
Regular Solutions in Vacuum Brans-Dicke Theory Compared to Vacuum Einstein Theory |
title_short |
Regular Solutions in Vacuum Brans-Dicke Theory Compared to Vacuum Einstein Theory |
title_full |
Regular Solutions in Vacuum Brans-Dicke Theory Compared to Vacuum Einstein Theory |
title_fullStr |
Regular Solutions in Vacuum Brans-Dicke Theory Compared to Vacuum Einstein Theory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Regular Solutions in Vacuum Brans-Dicke Theory Compared to Vacuum Einstein Theory |
title_sort |
regular solutions in vacuum brans-dicke theory compared to vacuum einstein theory |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Advances in High Energy Physics |
issn |
1687-7357 1687-7365 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
We will confront some static spherically symmetric vacuum Brans-Dicke solutions in the Jordan and Einstein Frames with the Robertson parameters. While the regular solution in the vacuum Einstein theory is just the Schwarzschild black hole, the same in the Jordan frame Brans-Dicke theory is shown to represent not a black hole but a traversable wormhole. But, in this case, the valid range of ω becomes too narrow to yield the observed weak field Robertson parameters at the positive mass mouth. The corresponding solution in the Einstein frame also provides a regular wormhole, and it yields the correct parametric values but only up to “one and half order.” We argue that a second-order contribution can in principle distinguish between the signatures of the regular wormhole and the singular Buchdahl solution in the Einstein frame. Thus, at the level of regular solutions, Brans-Dicke theory in each frame predicts effects very different from those of Einstein's theory. To our knowledge, these theoretical distinctions seem not to have received adequate attention so far. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/367029 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alinakhaybullina regularsolutionsinvacuumbransdicketheorycomparedtovacuumeinsteintheory AT ramilizmailov regularsolutionsinvacuumbransdicketheorycomparedtovacuumeinsteintheory AT kamalknandi regularsolutionsinvacuumbransdicketheorycomparedtovacuumeinsteintheory AT carlocattani regularsolutionsinvacuumbransdicketheorycomparedtovacuumeinsteintheory |
_version_ |
1716748945072324608 |