Effect of Anodal-tDCS on Event-Related Potentials: A Controlled Study

We aim to measure the postintervention effects of A-tDCS (anodal-tDCS) on brain potentials commonly used in BCI applications, namely, Event-Related Desynchronization (ERD), Event-Related Synchronization (ERS), and P300. Ten subjects were given sham and 1.5 mA A-tDCS for 15 minutes on two separate ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Izzidien, Sriharasha Ramaraju, Mohammed Ali Roula, Peter W. McCarthy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1584947
id doaj-fef48711b187456ea63226233e32268b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fef48711b187456ea63226233e32268b2020-11-24T23:58:16ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412016-01-01201610.1155/2016/15849471584947Effect of Anodal-tDCS on Event-Related Potentials: A Controlled StudyAhmed Izzidien0Sriharasha Ramaraju1Mohammed Ali Roula2Peter W. McCarthy3Social Cognition Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USAMedical Electronics and Signal Processing Research Unit, University of South Wales, Treforest, UKMedical Electronics and Signal Processing Research Unit, University of South Wales, Treforest, UKClinical Technology and Diagnostics Research Unit, University of South Wales, Treforest, UKWe aim to measure the postintervention effects of A-tDCS (anodal-tDCS) on brain potentials commonly used in BCI applications, namely, Event-Related Desynchronization (ERD), Event-Related Synchronization (ERS), and P300. Ten subjects were given sham and 1.5 mA A-tDCS for 15 minutes on two separate experiments in a double-blind, randomized order. Postintervention EEG was recorded while subjects were asked to perform a spelling task based on the “oddball paradigm” while P300 power was measured. Additionally, ERD and ERS were measured while subjects performed mental motor imagery tasks. ANOVA results showed that the absolute P300 power exhibited a statistically significant difference between sham and A-tDCS when measured over channel Pz (p=0.0002). However, the difference in ERD and ERS power was found to be statistically insignificant, in controversion of the the mainstay of the litrature on the subject. The outcomes confirm the possible postintervention effect of tDCS on the P300 response. Heightening P300 response using A-tDCS may help improve the accuracy of P300 spellers for neurologically impaired subjects. Additionally, it may help the development of neurorehabilitation methods targeting the parietal lobe.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1584947
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmed Izzidien
Sriharasha Ramaraju
Mohammed Ali Roula
Peter W. McCarthy
spellingShingle Ahmed Izzidien
Sriharasha Ramaraju
Mohammed Ali Roula
Peter W. McCarthy
Effect of Anodal-tDCS on Event-Related Potentials: A Controlled Study
BioMed Research International
author_facet Ahmed Izzidien
Sriharasha Ramaraju
Mohammed Ali Roula
Peter W. McCarthy
author_sort Ahmed Izzidien
title Effect of Anodal-tDCS on Event-Related Potentials: A Controlled Study
title_short Effect of Anodal-tDCS on Event-Related Potentials: A Controlled Study
title_full Effect of Anodal-tDCS on Event-Related Potentials: A Controlled Study
title_fullStr Effect of Anodal-tDCS on Event-Related Potentials: A Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Anodal-tDCS on Event-Related Potentials: A Controlled Study
title_sort effect of anodal-tdcs on event-related potentials: a controlled study
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2016-01-01
description We aim to measure the postintervention effects of A-tDCS (anodal-tDCS) on brain potentials commonly used in BCI applications, namely, Event-Related Desynchronization (ERD), Event-Related Synchronization (ERS), and P300. Ten subjects were given sham and 1.5 mA A-tDCS for 15 minutes on two separate experiments in a double-blind, randomized order. Postintervention EEG was recorded while subjects were asked to perform a spelling task based on the “oddball paradigm” while P300 power was measured. Additionally, ERD and ERS were measured while subjects performed mental motor imagery tasks. ANOVA results showed that the absolute P300 power exhibited a statistically significant difference between sham and A-tDCS when measured over channel Pz (p=0.0002). However, the difference in ERD and ERS power was found to be statistically insignificant, in controversion of the the mainstay of the litrature on the subject. The outcomes confirm the possible postintervention effect of tDCS on the P300 response. Heightening P300 response using A-tDCS may help improve the accuracy of P300 spellers for neurologically impaired subjects. Additionally, it may help the development of neurorehabilitation methods targeting the parietal lobe.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1584947
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedizzidien effectofanodaltdcsoneventrelatedpotentialsacontrolledstudy
AT sriharasharamaraju effectofanodaltdcsoneventrelatedpotentialsacontrolledstudy
AT mohammedaliroula effectofanodaltdcsoneventrelatedpotentialsacontrolledstudy
AT peterwmccarthy effectofanodaltdcsoneventrelatedpotentialsacontrolledstudy
_version_ 1725450865437835264