The impact of tensioning device mal-positioning on strand tension during Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In order to confer optimal strength and stiffness to the graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the maintenance of equal strand tension prior to fixation, is desired; positioning of the tensioning device can signif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin David, Hearn Trevor C, Stanley Richard M, Costi John J, Maharjan Rajesh, Field John R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-06-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Online Access:http://www.josr-online.com/content/6/1/33
id doaj-fec8a463ae724afda9b2de4f5c9480f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fec8a463ae724afda9b2de4f5c9480f12020-11-25T02:42:25ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2011-06-01613310.1186/1749-799X-6-33The impact of tensioning device mal-positioning on strand tension during Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstructionMartin DavidHearn Trevor CStanley Richard MCosti John JMaharjan RajeshField John R<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In order to confer optimal strength and stiffness to the graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the maintenance of equal strand tension prior to fixation, is desired; positioning of the tensioning device can significantly affect strand tension This study aimed to determine the effect of tensioning device mal-positioning on individual strand tension in simulated cadaveric ACL reconstructions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Twenty cadaveric specimens, comprising bovine tibia and tendon harvested from sheep, were used to simulate ACL reconstruction with a looped four-strand tendon graft. A proprietary tensioning device was used to tension the graft during tibial component fixation with graft tension recorded using load cells. The effects of the tensioning device at extreme angles, and in various locking states, was evaluated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Strand tension varied significantly when the tensioning device was held at extreme angles (p < 0.001) or in 'locked' configurations of the tensioning device (p < 0.046). Tendon position also produced significant effects (p < 0.016) on the resultant strand tension.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>An even distribution of tension among individual graft strands is obtained by maintaining the tensioning device in an unlocked state, aligned with the longitudinal axis of the tibial tunnel. If the maintenance of equal strand tension during tibial fixation of grafts is important, close attention must be paid to positioning of the tensioning device in order to optimize the resultant graft tension and, by implication, the strength and stiffness of the graft and ultimately, surgical outcome.</p> http://www.josr-online.com/content/6/1/33
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin David
Hearn Trevor C
Stanley Richard M
Costi John J
Maharjan Rajesh
Field John R
spellingShingle Martin David
Hearn Trevor C
Stanley Richard M
Costi John J
Maharjan Rajesh
Field John R
The impact of tensioning device mal-positioning on strand tension during Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
author_facet Martin David
Hearn Trevor C
Stanley Richard M
Costi John J
Maharjan Rajesh
Field John R
author_sort Martin David
title The impact of tensioning device mal-positioning on strand tension during Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction
title_short The impact of tensioning device mal-positioning on strand tension during Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction
title_full The impact of tensioning device mal-positioning on strand tension during Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction
title_fullStr The impact of tensioning device mal-positioning on strand tension during Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed The impact of tensioning device mal-positioning on strand tension during Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction
title_sort impact of tensioning device mal-positioning on strand tension during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
publisher BMC
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
issn 1749-799X
publishDate 2011-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In order to confer optimal strength and stiffness to the graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the maintenance of equal strand tension prior to fixation, is desired; positioning of the tensioning device can significantly affect strand tension This study aimed to determine the effect of tensioning device mal-positioning on individual strand tension in simulated cadaveric ACL reconstructions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Twenty cadaveric specimens, comprising bovine tibia and tendon harvested from sheep, were used to simulate ACL reconstruction with a looped four-strand tendon graft. A proprietary tensioning device was used to tension the graft during tibial component fixation with graft tension recorded using load cells. The effects of the tensioning device at extreme angles, and in various locking states, was evaluated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Strand tension varied significantly when the tensioning device was held at extreme angles (p < 0.001) or in 'locked' configurations of the tensioning device (p < 0.046). Tendon position also produced significant effects (p < 0.016) on the resultant strand tension.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>An even distribution of tension among individual graft strands is obtained by maintaining the tensioning device in an unlocked state, aligned with the longitudinal axis of the tibial tunnel. If the maintenance of equal strand tension during tibial fixation of grafts is important, close attention must be paid to positioning of the tensioning device in order to optimize the resultant graft tension and, by implication, the strength and stiffness of the graft and ultimately, surgical outcome.</p>
url http://www.josr-online.com/content/6/1/33
work_keys_str_mv AT martindavid theimpactoftensioningdevicemalpositioningonstrandtensionduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT hearntrevorc theimpactoftensioningdevicemalpositioningonstrandtensionduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT stanleyrichardm theimpactoftensioningdevicemalpositioningonstrandtensionduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT costijohnj theimpactoftensioningdevicemalpositioningonstrandtensionduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT maharjanrajesh theimpactoftensioningdevicemalpositioningonstrandtensionduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT fieldjohnr theimpactoftensioningdevicemalpositioningonstrandtensionduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT martindavid impactoftensioningdevicemalpositioningonstrandtensionduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT hearntrevorc impactoftensioningdevicemalpositioningonstrandtensionduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT stanleyrichardm impactoftensioningdevicemalpositioningonstrandtensionduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT costijohnj impactoftensioningdevicemalpositioningonstrandtensionduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT maharjanrajesh impactoftensioningdevicemalpositioningonstrandtensionduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT fieldjohnr impactoftensioningdevicemalpositioningonstrandtensionduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
_version_ 1724774087506526208