The role of higher thoracic irradiation doses in patients with limited stage of small-cell lung cancer: Retrospective study

Background: Small-cell lung cancer is highly chemo- and radiosensitive tumor. We evaluated two different radiotherapy doses applied sequentially with chemotherapy in relation to time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival in patients with limited disease of small cell lung c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mijović Milan, Živković Danko, Bajić Nada D., Šćepanović Danijela D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Oncology, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia 2010-01-01
Series:Archive of Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-7310/2010/0354-73101002008S.pdf
id doaj-febbce7007f34deea04d8b55146fe7ac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-febbce7007f34deea04d8b55146fe7ac2020-11-24T22:15:24ZengInstitute of Oncology, Sremska Kamenica, SerbiaArchive of Oncology0354-73102010-01-01181-281310.2298/AOO1002008SThe role of higher thoracic irradiation doses in patients with limited stage of small-cell lung cancer: Retrospective studyMijović MilanŽivković DankoBajić Nada D.Šćepanović Danijela D.Background: Small-cell lung cancer is highly chemo- and radiosensitive tumor. We evaluated two different radiotherapy doses applied sequentially with chemotherapy in relation to time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival in patients with limited disease of small cell lung cancer. Methods: From 1998 to 2003, 81 patients were treated for small-cell lung carcinoma. Median age was 57 years (range, 36-77 years) and female: male ratio was 1:4. Patients were initially treated with four cycles of chemotherapy during three weeks (cisplatin 80mg/m2 IV, day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV, days 1 - 3). One month later, patients received up to 44 Gy, 2 Gy per day, 5 days per week (group I, 41 patients) or above 44 Gy, standard fractionation (group II, 40 patients), to mediastinum and tumor. Range of higher radiotherapy doses was 54 Gy to 64 Gy, standard fractionation. We evaluated if different radiotherapy doses had any influence on time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival. Results: The median follow up time was 23 months (range, 12-72 months) for both groups of patients (81). The median time to progression in group I of patients (41) was 13 months (range, 11-29 months) while median time to progression in group II of patients (40) was 20 months (min=9, max=60). There was no statistically significant difference in relapse rate between two groups of patients (p>0.05, Fisher test). However, there was difference but not statistically significant in one-year progression free survival (p=0.05, chi square test) between groups, while there was statistically significant difference in two-year progression free survival favoring higher doses of radiotherapy (p<0.05, chi-square test). The median overall survival was 18 months (range, 12-35 months) for group I of patients and 28 months (range, 15-72 months) for group II of patients. There was no statistically significant advantage between two groups of patients for one-year overall survival (p>0.05, chi-square test). However, there was statistically significant difference in overall survival favoring higher radiotherapy doses for two-year overall survival (p<0.05, chi-square test). Conclusion: We found that higher radiotherapy doses had an impact on long-term time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival (2 years) of patients. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-7310/2010/0354-73101002008S.pdfSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaRadiotherapyRadiation DosageDose-Response RelationshipTreatment Outcome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mijović Milan
Živković Danko
Bajić Nada D.
Šćepanović Danijela D.
spellingShingle Mijović Milan
Živković Danko
Bajić Nada D.
Šćepanović Danijela D.
The role of higher thoracic irradiation doses in patients with limited stage of small-cell lung cancer: Retrospective study
Archive of Oncology
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Radiotherapy
Radiation Dosage
Dose-Response Relationship
Treatment Outcome
author_facet Mijović Milan
Živković Danko
Bajić Nada D.
Šćepanović Danijela D.
author_sort Mijović Milan
title The role of higher thoracic irradiation doses in patients with limited stage of small-cell lung cancer: Retrospective study
title_short The role of higher thoracic irradiation doses in patients with limited stage of small-cell lung cancer: Retrospective study
title_full The role of higher thoracic irradiation doses in patients with limited stage of small-cell lung cancer: Retrospective study
title_fullStr The role of higher thoracic irradiation doses in patients with limited stage of small-cell lung cancer: Retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed The role of higher thoracic irradiation doses in patients with limited stage of small-cell lung cancer: Retrospective study
title_sort role of higher thoracic irradiation doses in patients with limited stage of small-cell lung cancer: retrospective study
publisher Institute of Oncology, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
series Archive of Oncology
issn 0354-7310
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Background: Small-cell lung cancer is highly chemo- and radiosensitive tumor. We evaluated two different radiotherapy doses applied sequentially with chemotherapy in relation to time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival in patients with limited disease of small cell lung cancer. Methods: From 1998 to 2003, 81 patients were treated for small-cell lung carcinoma. Median age was 57 years (range, 36-77 years) and female: male ratio was 1:4. Patients were initially treated with four cycles of chemotherapy during three weeks (cisplatin 80mg/m2 IV, day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV, days 1 - 3). One month later, patients received up to 44 Gy, 2 Gy per day, 5 days per week (group I, 41 patients) or above 44 Gy, standard fractionation (group II, 40 patients), to mediastinum and tumor. Range of higher radiotherapy doses was 54 Gy to 64 Gy, standard fractionation. We evaluated if different radiotherapy doses had any influence on time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival. Results: The median follow up time was 23 months (range, 12-72 months) for both groups of patients (81). The median time to progression in group I of patients (41) was 13 months (range, 11-29 months) while median time to progression in group II of patients (40) was 20 months (min=9, max=60). There was no statistically significant difference in relapse rate between two groups of patients (p>0.05, Fisher test). However, there was difference but not statistically significant in one-year progression free survival (p=0.05, chi square test) between groups, while there was statistically significant difference in two-year progression free survival favoring higher doses of radiotherapy (p<0.05, chi-square test). The median overall survival was 18 months (range, 12-35 months) for group I of patients and 28 months (range, 15-72 months) for group II of patients. There was no statistically significant advantage between two groups of patients for one-year overall survival (p>0.05, chi-square test). However, there was statistically significant difference in overall survival favoring higher radiotherapy doses for two-year overall survival (p<0.05, chi-square test). Conclusion: We found that higher radiotherapy doses had an impact on long-term time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival (2 years) of patients.
topic Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Radiotherapy
Radiation Dosage
Dose-Response Relationship
Treatment Outcome
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-7310/2010/0354-73101002008S.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mijovicmilan theroleofhigherthoracicirradiationdosesinpatientswithlimitedstageofsmallcelllungcancerretrospectivestudy
AT zivkovicdanko theroleofhigherthoracicirradiationdosesinpatientswithlimitedstageofsmallcelllungcancerretrospectivestudy
AT bajicnadad theroleofhigherthoracicirradiationdosesinpatientswithlimitedstageofsmallcelllungcancerretrospectivestudy
AT scepanovicdanijelad theroleofhigherthoracicirradiationdosesinpatientswithlimitedstageofsmallcelllungcancerretrospectivestudy
AT mijovicmilan roleofhigherthoracicirradiationdosesinpatientswithlimitedstageofsmallcelllungcancerretrospectivestudy
AT zivkovicdanko roleofhigherthoracicirradiationdosesinpatientswithlimitedstageofsmallcelllungcancerretrospectivestudy
AT bajicnadad roleofhigherthoracicirradiationdosesinpatientswithlimitedstageofsmallcelllungcancerretrospectivestudy
AT scepanovicdanijelad roleofhigherthoracicirradiationdosesinpatientswithlimitedstageofsmallcelllungcancerretrospectivestudy
_version_ 1725794490819543040