| Summary: | While whole-body vibration (WBV) has recently been introduced as a non-pharmacological therapy for osteoporosis, studies have shown that it has no significant effect on the lumbar spine in older women. However, the vibration protocols differed among studies, and the major factor influencing the outcomes is unclear. The intention of the present study was to evaluate the effect of WBV—vertical (v) or horizontal (h) and of different frequencies and application regimes (1× or 2×/d)—on lumbar spine properties in ovariectomized rats (Ovx).
Three experiments were conducted. Thirteen-week old female Sprague–Dawley rats were Ovx or left intact (Non-Ovx). After eight weeks, all of the rats underwent metaphyseal osteotomy of the tibiae. Five days later, the rats were divided into six groups (n = 15): 1) intact, 2) Ovx, and 3–6) Ovx exposed to WBV. In Experiment 1, groups 3–6 underwent 35 Hz-v, 50 Hz-v, 70 Hz-v, and 90 Hz-v, respectively. In Experiment 2, groups 3–6 underwent 30 Hz-h, 50 Hz-h, 70 Hz-h, and 90 Hz-h, respectively. In Experiment 3, groups 3–6 underwent 35 Hz-v, 70 Hz-v, 35 Hz-h, and 70 Hz-h, respectively. Vibration exposure was 15 min 1×/d in Experiment 1 and 2 and 2×/d in Experiment 3 for up to 30 days. Vertebral bodies were used in micro-computed tomography, biomechanical, ashing, and gene expression analyses.
Vertical vibrations applied once a day favorably affected bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and Ca2+/PO43− and decreased Rankl gene expression. When applied twice a day, v-vibrations diminished mineral content. Horizontal vibrations (1×/d) reduced Ca2+/PO43− ratio and Opg mRNA level, whereas h-vibration (2×/d) normalized OC serum levels. Many of the other measured parameters did not reveal any significant differences between the vibrated groups and the untreated Ovx group. The effect of ovariectomy was confirmed by atrophied uterus, impaired biomechanical properties, and bone mineral density and BV/TV of the vertebral body.
The findings of the present study indicate that application frequency rate and direction of vibration might influence spine response differently. However, we were unable to find any clearly beneficial or harmful effect of vibration regimes on the osteopenic lumbar spine in rats.
|
|---|
