Closed suction system versus open suction

Background: Catheter suction is used to remove tracheal secretions through the endotracheal tube in mechanically ventilated patients, which may be either closed tracheal suction system (CTSS) or open one. In CTSS, the catheter is a part of ventilator circuit with no need to disconnect the ventilator...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Elmansoury, Hedya Said
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-07-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0422763815300911
id doaj-feaea6a3f359417b87f737c4f909b6f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-feaea6a3f359417b87f737c4f909b6f52020-11-24T20:52:20ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEgyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis0422-76382017-07-0166350951510.1016/j.ejcdt.2016.08.001Closed suction system versus open suctionAhmed ElmansouryHedya SaidBackground: Catheter suction is used to remove tracheal secretions through the endotracheal tube in mechanically ventilated patients, which may be either closed tracheal suction system (CTSS) or open one. In CTSS, the catheter is a part of ventilator circuit with no need to disconnect the ventilator. It seems that the CTSS prevent soiling and spraying of respiratory secretion into the ICU. Objective: To compare CTSS system in comparison with an open tracheal suction system in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h in terms of VAP incidence, length of stay in the intensive care unit and mortality. Methods: We prospectively recruited all mechanically ventilated patients in our general ICU, Dar El Shefa hospital between January 2012 and January 2013. Group A are those with open tracheal suction system (OTSS) and group B with closed tracheal suction system (CTSS), comparing VAP incidence, length of stay in the intensive care unit and mortality between the two groups. Results: Group A (OTSS) where the incidence of VAP was 30.13/1000 ventilator days not statistically significant in comparison with patients in group B with CTSS with VAP incidence 17.48/1000 ventilator days. Conclusion: There is no difference in the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia and mortality rates between the two groups. The average length of stay declined in patients with OTSS group.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0422763815300911Ventilator associated pneumoniaEndotracheal tubeClosed suction systemOpen suction system
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmed Elmansoury
Hedya Said
spellingShingle Ahmed Elmansoury
Hedya Said
Closed suction system versus open suction
Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
Ventilator associated pneumonia
Endotracheal tube
Closed suction system
Open suction system
author_facet Ahmed Elmansoury
Hedya Said
author_sort Ahmed Elmansoury
title Closed suction system versus open suction
title_short Closed suction system versus open suction
title_full Closed suction system versus open suction
title_fullStr Closed suction system versus open suction
title_full_unstemmed Closed suction system versus open suction
title_sort closed suction system versus open suction
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
issn 0422-7638
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Background: Catheter suction is used to remove tracheal secretions through the endotracheal tube in mechanically ventilated patients, which may be either closed tracheal suction system (CTSS) or open one. In CTSS, the catheter is a part of ventilator circuit with no need to disconnect the ventilator. It seems that the CTSS prevent soiling and spraying of respiratory secretion into the ICU. Objective: To compare CTSS system in comparison with an open tracheal suction system in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h in terms of VAP incidence, length of stay in the intensive care unit and mortality. Methods: We prospectively recruited all mechanically ventilated patients in our general ICU, Dar El Shefa hospital between January 2012 and January 2013. Group A are those with open tracheal suction system (OTSS) and group B with closed tracheal suction system (CTSS), comparing VAP incidence, length of stay in the intensive care unit and mortality between the two groups. Results: Group A (OTSS) where the incidence of VAP was 30.13/1000 ventilator days not statistically significant in comparison with patients in group B with CTSS with VAP incidence 17.48/1000 ventilator days. Conclusion: There is no difference in the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia and mortality rates between the two groups. The average length of stay declined in patients with OTSS group.
topic Ventilator associated pneumonia
Endotracheal tube
Closed suction system
Open suction system
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0422763815300911
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedelmansoury closedsuctionsystemversusopensuction
AT hedyasaid closedsuctionsystemversusopensuction
_version_ 1716799982229520384