A dilemma of the uniqueness of weather and climate model closure parameters

Parameterisation schemes of subgrid-scale physical processes in atmospheric models contain so-called closure parameters. Their precise values are not generally known; thus, they are subject to fine-tuning for achieving optimal model performance. In this article, we show that there is a dilemma conce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Janne Hakkarainen, Antti Solonen, Alexander Ilin, Jouni Susiluoto, Marko Laine, Heikki Haario, Heikki Järvinen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2013-05-01
Series:Tellus: Series A, Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.tellusa.net/index.php/tellusa/article/download/20147/pdf_1
id doaj-feac91652d084f0c9d527426a0b0d4f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-feac91652d084f0c9d527426a0b0d4f42020-11-25T01:39:04ZengTaylor & Francis GroupTellus: Series A, Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography0280-64951600-08702013-05-016501810.3402/tellusa.v65i0.20147A dilemma of the uniqueness of weather and climate model closure parametersJanne HakkarainenAntti SolonenAlexander IlinJouni SusiluotoMarko LaineHeikki HaarioHeikki JärvinenParameterisation schemes of subgrid-scale physical processes in atmospheric models contain so-called closure parameters. Their precise values are not generally known; thus, they are subject to fine-tuning for achieving optimal model performance. In this article, we show that there is a dilemma concerning the optimal parameter values: an identical prediction model formulation can have two different optimal closure parameter value settings depending on the level of approximations made in the data assimilation component of the prediction system. This result tends to indicate that the prediction model re-tuning in large-scale systems is not only needed when the prediction model undergoes a major change, but also when the data assimilation component is updated. Moreover, we advocate an accurate albeit expensive method based on so-called filter likelihood for the closure parameter estimation that is applicable in fine-tuning of both prediction model and data assimilation system parameters. In this article, we use a modified Lorenz-95 system as a prediction model and extended Kalman filter and ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation. With this setup, we can compute the filter likelihood for the chosen parameters using the output of the two versions of the Kalman filter and apply a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to explore the parameter posterior distributions.http://www.tellusa.net/index.php/tellusa/article/download/20147/pdf_1model tuningMarkov chain Monte Carlolikelihoodfilter formulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Janne Hakkarainen
Antti Solonen
Alexander Ilin
Jouni Susiluoto
Marko Laine
Heikki Haario
Heikki Järvinen
spellingShingle Janne Hakkarainen
Antti Solonen
Alexander Ilin
Jouni Susiluoto
Marko Laine
Heikki Haario
Heikki Järvinen
A dilemma of the uniqueness of weather and climate model closure parameters
Tellus: Series A, Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
model tuning
Markov chain Monte Carlo
likelihood
filter formulation
author_facet Janne Hakkarainen
Antti Solonen
Alexander Ilin
Jouni Susiluoto
Marko Laine
Heikki Haario
Heikki Järvinen
author_sort Janne Hakkarainen
title A dilemma of the uniqueness of weather and climate model closure parameters
title_short A dilemma of the uniqueness of weather and climate model closure parameters
title_full A dilemma of the uniqueness of weather and climate model closure parameters
title_fullStr A dilemma of the uniqueness of weather and climate model closure parameters
title_full_unstemmed A dilemma of the uniqueness of weather and climate model closure parameters
title_sort dilemma of the uniqueness of weather and climate model closure parameters
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Tellus: Series A, Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
issn 0280-6495
1600-0870
publishDate 2013-05-01
description Parameterisation schemes of subgrid-scale physical processes in atmospheric models contain so-called closure parameters. Their precise values are not generally known; thus, they are subject to fine-tuning for achieving optimal model performance. In this article, we show that there is a dilemma concerning the optimal parameter values: an identical prediction model formulation can have two different optimal closure parameter value settings depending on the level of approximations made in the data assimilation component of the prediction system. This result tends to indicate that the prediction model re-tuning in large-scale systems is not only needed when the prediction model undergoes a major change, but also when the data assimilation component is updated. Moreover, we advocate an accurate albeit expensive method based on so-called filter likelihood for the closure parameter estimation that is applicable in fine-tuning of both prediction model and data assimilation system parameters. In this article, we use a modified Lorenz-95 system as a prediction model and extended Kalman filter and ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation. With this setup, we can compute the filter likelihood for the chosen parameters using the output of the two versions of the Kalman filter and apply a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to explore the parameter posterior distributions.
topic model tuning
Markov chain Monte Carlo
likelihood
filter formulation
url http://www.tellusa.net/index.php/tellusa/article/download/20147/pdf_1
work_keys_str_mv AT jannehakkarainen adilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT anttisolonen adilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT alexanderilin adilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT jounisusiluoto adilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT markolaine adilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT heikkihaario adilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT heikkijx00e4rvinen adilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT jannehakkarainen dilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT anttisolonen dilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT alexanderilin dilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT jounisusiluoto dilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT markolaine dilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT heikkihaario dilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
AT heikkijx00e4rvinen dilemmaoftheuniquenessofweatherandclimatemodelclosureparameters
_version_ 1725050528824557568