Fertility Concern in Finland and Russia: Economic Thinking and Ideal Family Size in the Rhetoric of Population Policies

This article deals with fertility concern in Russian and Finnish population policies. The article points out that some commonly known discourses are persistently used as arguments in fertility-related population policies. In Finland, these include, for instance, discourses on ageing nation and ec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anna-Maria Isola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Population Research Institute of Väestöliitto 2008-01-01
Series:Finnish Yearbook of Population Research
Online Access:https://journal.fi/fypr/article/view/45035
id doaj-fe8ae952a55a4ccdac10f0cf692e9f49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe8ae952a55a4ccdac10f0cf692e9f492020-11-25T00:15:23ZengPopulation Research Institute of VäestöliittoFinnish Yearbook of Population Research1796-61831796-61912008-01-0143 Fertility Concern in Finland and Russia: Economic Thinking and Ideal Family Size in the Rhetoric of Population PoliciesAnna-Maria IsolaThis article deals with fertility concern in Russian and Finnish population policies. The article points out that some commonly known discourses are persistently used as arguments in fertility-related population policies. In Finland, these include, for instance, discourses on ageing nation and economic competitiveness. Russian policymakers use a crisis discourse that consists of three sub-discourses: demographic crisis, reproductive health in crisis and family crisis. The Russian government implements pronatalist population policies, whereas Finnish authorities hesitate to use the term population policy because of its emphasis on reproductive rights on the one hand, and the negative associations of population policy on the other. Russia has both population and family programs, as well as a new law with a speci? cally pronatalist emphasis. Conversely, Finland uses family policy as a tool of population policy. https://journal.fi/fypr/article/view/45035
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna-Maria Isola
spellingShingle Anna-Maria Isola
Fertility Concern in Finland and Russia: Economic Thinking and Ideal Family Size in the Rhetoric of Population Policies
Finnish Yearbook of Population Research
author_facet Anna-Maria Isola
author_sort Anna-Maria Isola
title Fertility Concern in Finland and Russia: Economic Thinking and Ideal Family Size in the Rhetoric of Population Policies
title_short Fertility Concern in Finland and Russia: Economic Thinking and Ideal Family Size in the Rhetoric of Population Policies
title_full Fertility Concern in Finland and Russia: Economic Thinking and Ideal Family Size in the Rhetoric of Population Policies
title_fullStr Fertility Concern in Finland and Russia: Economic Thinking and Ideal Family Size in the Rhetoric of Population Policies
title_full_unstemmed Fertility Concern in Finland and Russia: Economic Thinking and Ideal Family Size in the Rhetoric of Population Policies
title_sort fertility concern in finland and russia: economic thinking and ideal family size in the rhetoric of population policies
publisher Population Research Institute of Väestöliitto
series Finnish Yearbook of Population Research
issn 1796-6183
1796-6191
publishDate 2008-01-01
description This article deals with fertility concern in Russian and Finnish population policies. The article points out that some commonly known discourses are persistently used as arguments in fertility-related population policies. In Finland, these include, for instance, discourses on ageing nation and economic competitiveness. Russian policymakers use a crisis discourse that consists of three sub-discourses: demographic crisis, reproductive health in crisis and family crisis. The Russian government implements pronatalist population policies, whereas Finnish authorities hesitate to use the term population policy because of its emphasis on reproductive rights on the one hand, and the negative associations of population policy on the other. Russia has both population and family programs, as well as a new law with a speci? cally pronatalist emphasis. Conversely, Finland uses family policy as a tool of population policy.
url https://journal.fi/fypr/article/view/45035
work_keys_str_mv AT annamariaisola fertilityconcerninfinlandandrussiaeconomicthinkingandidealfamilysizeintherhetoricofpopulationpolicies
_version_ 1725387135893110784