Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes

Background:. Prosthetic breast reconstruction in the setting of radiotherapy is associated with poor outcomes. Until recently, prosthetic breast reconstruction was predominantly performed by placing the prosthesis in a subpectoral space. Placement of the prosthesis in a prepectoral space is currentl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steven Sigalove, MD, G. Patrick Maxwell, MD, Noemi M. Sigalove, MD, Toni L. Storm-Dickerson, MD, Nicole Pope, MSN, FNP-C, CPSN, Jami Rice, MSPAS, PA-C, Allen Gabriel, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2017-12-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001631
id doaj-fe87b45a7144429fbe9b092ca77fb657
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Steven Sigalove, MD
G. Patrick Maxwell, MD
Noemi M. Sigalove, MD
Toni L. Storm-Dickerson, MD
Nicole Pope, MSN, FNP-C, CPSN
Jami Rice, MSPAS, PA-C
Allen Gabriel, MD
spellingShingle Steven Sigalove, MD
G. Patrick Maxwell, MD
Noemi M. Sigalove, MD
Toni L. Storm-Dickerson, MD
Nicole Pope, MSN, FNP-C, CPSN
Jami Rice, MSPAS, PA-C
Allen Gabriel, MD
Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
author_facet Steven Sigalove, MD
G. Patrick Maxwell, MD
Noemi M. Sigalove, MD
Toni L. Storm-Dickerson, MD
Nicole Pope, MSN, FNP-C, CPSN
Jami Rice, MSPAS, PA-C
Allen Gabriel, MD
author_sort Steven Sigalove, MD
title Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes
title_short Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes
title_full Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes
title_fullStr Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes
title_sort prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy: short-term outcomes
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
issn 2169-7574
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Background:. Prosthetic breast reconstruction in the setting of radiotherapy is associated with poor outcomes. Until recently, prosthetic breast reconstruction was predominantly performed by placing the prosthesis in a subpectoral space. Placement of the prosthesis in a prepectoral space is currently emerging as a simpler, alternative approach to subpectoral placement. The impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on prepectoral reconstruction has not yet been specifically assessed. This study compared the outcomes of patients who underwent immediate, direct-to-implant, or 2-staged, prepectoral breast reconstruction followed by PMRT with those from patients who did not receive PMRT. Methods:. Patients with well-perfused skin flaps and without contraindications, including uncontrolled diabetes-mellitus, previous irradiation, and current tobacco use, were offered the prepectoral approach. Following implant or expander placement, patients underwent planned or unplanned radiotherapy. Complications after each stage of reconstruction were recorded. Results:. Thirty-three patients underwent 52 breast reconstructions via the prepectoral approach. Sixty-five percentage of the breasts were irradiated, including 21% after expander and 44% after implant placement. Patients were followed for a mean of 25.1 ± 6.4 months. Complication rate in irradiated breasts was 5.9% (1 incidence of seroma and 1 incidence of wound dehiscence followed by expander removal) and 0% in nonirradiated breasts. Capsular contracture rate was 0% in both irradiated and nonirradiated breasts. Conclusions:. Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction followed by PMRT appears to be well tolerated, with no excess risk of adverse outcomes, at least in the short term. Longer follow-up is needed to better understand the risk of PMRT in prepectorally reconstructed breasts.
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001631
work_keys_str_mv AT stevensigalovemd prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes
AT gpatrickmaxwellmd prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes
AT noemimsigalovemd prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes
AT tonilstormdickersonmd prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes
AT nicolepopemsnfnpccpsn prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes
AT jamiricemspaspac prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes
AT allengabrielmd prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes
_version_ 1725528303663579136
spelling doaj-fe87b45a7144429fbe9b092ca77fb6572020-11-24T23:34:39ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742017-12-01512e163110.1097/GOX.0000000000001631201712000-00014Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term OutcomesSteven Sigalove, MD0G. Patrick Maxwell, MD1Noemi M. Sigalove, MD2Toni L. Storm-Dickerson, MD3Nicole Pope, MSN, FNP-C, CPSN4Jami Rice, MSPAS, PA-C5Allen Gabriel, MD6From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.Background:. Prosthetic breast reconstruction in the setting of radiotherapy is associated with poor outcomes. Until recently, prosthetic breast reconstruction was predominantly performed by placing the prosthesis in a subpectoral space. Placement of the prosthesis in a prepectoral space is currently emerging as a simpler, alternative approach to subpectoral placement. The impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on prepectoral reconstruction has not yet been specifically assessed. This study compared the outcomes of patients who underwent immediate, direct-to-implant, or 2-staged, prepectoral breast reconstruction followed by PMRT with those from patients who did not receive PMRT. Methods:. Patients with well-perfused skin flaps and without contraindications, including uncontrolled diabetes-mellitus, previous irradiation, and current tobacco use, were offered the prepectoral approach. Following implant or expander placement, patients underwent planned or unplanned radiotherapy. Complications after each stage of reconstruction were recorded. Results:. Thirty-three patients underwent 52 breast reconstructions via the prepectoral approach. Sixty-five percentage of the breasts were irradiated, including 21% after expander and 44% after implant placement. Patients were followed for a mean of 25.1 ± 6.4 months. Complication rate in irradiated breasts was 5.9% (1 incidence of seroma and 1 incidence of wound dehiscence followed by expander removal) and 0% in nonirradiated breasts. Capsular contracture rate was 0% in both irradiated and nonirradiated breasts. Conclusions:. Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction followed by PMRT appears to be well tolerated, with no excess risk of adverse outcomes, at least in the short term. Longer follow-up is needed to better understand the risk of PMRT in prepectorally reconstructed breasts.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001631