Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes
Background:. Prosthetic breast reconstruction in the setting of radiotherapy is associated with poor outcomes. Until recently, prosthetic breast reconstruction was predominantly performed by placing the prosthesis in a subpectoral space. Placement of the prosthesis in a prepectoral space is currentl...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001631 |
id |
doaj-fe87b45a7144429fbe9b092ca77fb657 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Steven Sigalove, MD G. Patrick Maxwell, MD Noemi M. Sigalove, MD Toni L. Storm-Dickerson, MD Nicole Pope, MSN, FNP-C, CPSN Jami Rice, MSPAS, PA-C Allen Gabriel, MD |
spellingShingle |
Steven Sigalove, MD G. Patrick Maxwell, MD Noemi M. Sigalove, MD Toni L. Storm-Dickerson, MD Nicole Pope, MSN, FNP-C, CPSN Jami Rice, MSPAS, PA-C Allen Gabriel, MD Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
author_facet |
Steven Sigalove, MD G. Patrick Maxwell, MD Noemi M. Sigalove, MD Toni L. Storm-Dickerson, MD Nicole Pope, MSN, FNP-C, CPSN Jami Rice, MSPAS, PA-C Allen Gabriel, MD |
author_sort |
Steven Sigalove, MD |
title |
Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes |
title_short |
Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes |
title_full |
Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes |
title_fullStr |
Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes |
title_sort |
prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy: short-term outcomes |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer |
series |
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
issn |
2169-7574 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
Background:. Prosthetic breast reconstruction in the setting of radiotherapy is associated with poor outcomes. Until recently, prosthetic breast reconstruction was predominantly performed by placing the prosthesis in a subpectoral space. Placement of the prosthesis in a prepectoral space is currently emerging as a simpler, alternative approach to subpectoral placement. The impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on prepectoral reconstruction has not yet been specifically assessed. This study compared the outcomes of patients who underwent immediate, direct-to-implant, or 2-staged, prepectoral breast reconstruction followed by PMRT with those from patients who did not receive PMRT.
Methods:. Patients with well-perfused skin flaps and without contraindications, including uncontrolled diabetes-mellitus, previous irradiation, and current tobacco use, were offered the prepectoral approach. Following implant or expander placement, patients underwent planned or unplanned radiotherapy. Complications after each stage of reconstruction were recorded.
Results:. Thirty-three patients underwent 52 breast reconstructions via the prepectoral approach. Sixty-five percentage of the breasts were irradiated, including 21% after expander and 44% after implant placement. Patients were followed for a mean of 25.1 ± 6.4 months. Complication rate in irradiated breasts was 5.9% (1 incidence of seroma and 1 incidence of wound dehiscence followed by expander removal) and 0% in nonirradiated breasts. Capsular contracture rate was 0% in both irradiated and nonirradiated breasts.
Conclusions:. Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction followed by PMRT appears to be well tolerated, with no excess risk of adverse outcomes, at least in the short term. Longer follow-up is needed to better understand the risk of PMRT in prepectorally reconstructed breasts. |
url |
http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001631 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stevensigalovemd prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes AT gpatrickmaxwellmd prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes AT noemimsigalovemd prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes AT tonilstormdickersonmd prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes AT nicolepopemsnfnpccpsn prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes AT jamiricemspaspac prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes AT allengabrielmd prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstructionandpostmastectomyradiotherapyshorttermoutcomes |
_version_ |
1725528303663579136 |
spelling |
doaj-fe87b45a7144429fbe9b092ca77fb6572020-11-24T23:34:39ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742017-12-01512e163110.1097/GOX.0000000000001631201712000-00014Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term OutcomesSteven Sigalove, MD0G. Patrick Maxwell, MD1Noemi M. Sigalove, MD2Toni L. Storm-Dickerson, MD3Nicole Pope, MSN, FNP-C, CPSN4Jami Rice, MSPAS, PA-C5Allen Gabriel, MD6From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.From the *DuPage Medical Group/DMG AESTHETICS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.; ‡Department of Breast Surgery, Central DuPage Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Winfield, Ill.; §Compass Oncology, Portland, Ore.; ¶Compass Oncology, Vancouver, Wash.; ‖DuPage Medical Group, Winfield, Ill.; **Peacehealth Medical Group, Vancouver, Wash.; and ††Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.Background:. Prosthetic breast reconstruction in the setting of radiotherapy is associated with poor outcomes. Until recently, prosthetic breast reconstruction was predominantly performed by placing the prosthesis in a subpectoral space. Placement of the prosthesis in a prepectoral space is currently emerging as a simpler, alternative approach to subpectoral placement. The impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on prepectoral reconstruction has not yet been specifically assessed. This study compared the outcomes of patients who underwent immediate, direct-to-implant, or 2-staged, prepectoral breast reconstruction followed by PMRT with those from patients who did not receive PMRT. Methods:. Patients with well-perfused skin flaps and without contraindications, including uncontrolled diabetes-mellitus, previous irradiation, and current tobacco use, were offered the prepectoral approach. Following implant or expander placement, patients underwent planned or unplanned radiotherapy. Complications after each stage of reconstruction were recorded. Results:. Thirty-three patients underwent 52 breast reconstructions via the prepectoral approach. Sixty-five percentage of the breasts were irradiated, including 21% after expander and 44% after implant placement. Patients were followed for a mean of 25.1 ± 6.4 months. Complication rate in irradiated breasts was 5.9% (1 incidence of seroma and 1 incidence of wound dehiscence followed by expander removal) and 0% in nonirradiated breasts. Capsular contracture rate was 0% in both irradiated and nonirradiated breasts. Conclusions:. Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction followed by PMRT appears to be well tolerated, with no excess risk of adverse outcomes, at least in the short term. Longer follow-up is needed to better understand the risk of PMRT in prepectorally reconstructed breasts.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001631 |