The discriminative power of patient experience surveys

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Comparisons of patient experiences between providers are increasingly used as an index of performance. The present study describes the ability of patient experience surveys to discriminate between healthcare providers for various pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: de Boer Dolf, Delnoij Diana, Rademakers Jany
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-12-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/332
id doaj-fe72b4c563a34fa6b4733a642c481b59
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe72b4c563a34fa6b4733a642c481b592020-11-25T00:27:32ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632011-12-0111133210.1186/1472-6963-11-332The discriminative power of patient experience surveysde Boer DolfDelnoij DianaRademakers Jany<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Comparisons of patient experiences between providers are increasingly used as an index of performance. The present study describes the ability of patient experience surveys to discriminate between healthcare providers for various patient groups and quality aspects, and reports the sample sizes required for reliable (comparisons of) provider scores.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>The consumer quality index is a family of surveys that are tailored to specific patient groups. Data was used from patients who underwent cataract surgery, patients who underwent hip or knee surgery, patients suffering from spinal disc herniation and patients suffering from varicose veins. Multi-level regression models were fitted to assess the proportion of variance in patient experiences that is attributable to providers for various quality aspects.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The proportion of variance in patient experiences that is attributable to providers varied from 0.001 to 0.054. The required sample size for reliable estimates at the provider level varied from 41 to 1967 per provider. Differences in discriminative power between patient groups and/or quality aspects were inconsistent, with one exception: for all groups, the discriminative power of experiences regarding change in physical functioning was particularly limited.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>From a statistical point of view, the discriminative power appears limited. The sample sizes required for reliable estimates are often substantial and deserve careful consideration when setting up measurements. Future research should evaluate the discriminative power by validating differences between providers in patient experiences with other indices and should explore other, more sensitive measures of patient experiences regarding treatment-related changes in physical functioning.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/332
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author de Boer Dolf
Delnoij Diana
Rademakers Jany
spellingShingle de Boer Dolf
Delnoij Diana
Rademakers Jany
The discriminative power of patient experience surveys
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet de Boer Dolf
Delnoij Diana
Rademakers Jany
author_sort de Boer Dolf
title The discriminative power of patient experience surveys
title_short The discriminative power of patient experience surveys
title_full The discriminative power of patient experience surveys
title_fullStr The discriminative power of patient experience surveys
title_full_unstemmed The discriminative power of patient experience surveys
title_sort discriminative power of patient experience surveys
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2011-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Comparisons of patient experiences between providers are increasingly used as an index of performance. The present study describes the ability of patient experience surveys to discriminate between healthcare providers for various patient groups and quality aspects, and reports the sample sizes required for reliable (comparisons of) provider scores.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>The consumer quality index is a family of surveys that are tailored to specific patient groups. Data was used from patients who underwent cataract surgery, patients who underwent hip or knee surgery, patients suffering from spinal disc herniation and patients suffering from varicose veins. Multi-level regression models were fitted to assess the proportion of variance in patient experiences that is attributable to providers for various quality aspects.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The proportion of variance in patient experiences that is attributable to providers varied from 0.001 to 0.054. The required sample size for reliable estimates at the provider level varied from 41 to 1967 per provider. Differences in discriminative power between patient groups and/or quality aspects were inconsistent, with one exception: for all groups, the discriminative power of experiences regarding change in physical functioning was particularly limited.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>From a statistical point of view, the discriminative power appears limited. The sample sizes required for reliable estimates are often substantial and deserve careful consideration when setting up measurements. Future research should evaluate the discriminative power by validating differences between providers in patient experiences with other indices and should explore other, more sensitive measures of patient experiences regarding treatment-related changes in physical functioning.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/332
work_keys_str_mv AT deboerdolf thediscriminativepowerofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT delnoijdiana thediscriminativepowerofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT rademakersjany thediscriminativepowerofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT deboerdolf discriminativepowerofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT delnoijdiana discriminativepowerofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT rademakersjany discriminativepowerofpatientexperiencesurveys
_version_ 1725339253699772416