Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis
SettingLuteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) act on the same receptor, activating different signal transduction pathways. The role of LH or hCG addition to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as well as menopausal gonadotropins (human menopausal gonadotropin; hMG) in control...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Endocrinology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fendo.2017.00114/full |
id |
doaj-fe6b590c6e8f4024bdcb828621dd7f37 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fe6b590c6e8f4024bdcb828621dd7f372020-11-24T23:58:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922017-06-01810.3389/fendo.2017.00114262054Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysisDaniele Santi0Daniele Santi1Livio Casarini2Livio Casarini3Carlo Alviggi4Manuela Simoni5Manuela Simoni6Manuela Simoni7Unit of Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Geriatrics, Azienda OU of Modena, Modena, ItalyUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyCenter for Genomic Research, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, ItalyUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Geriatrics, Azienda OU of Modena, Modena, ItalyCenter for Genomic Research, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalySettingLuteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) act on the same receptor, activating different signal transduction pathways. The role of LH or hCG addition to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as well as menopausal gonadotropins (human menopausal gonadotropin; hMG) in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is debated.ObjectiveTo compare FSH + LH, or FSH + hCG or hMG vs. FSH alone on COS outcomes.DesignA meta-analysis according to PRISMA statement and Cochrane Collaboration was performed, including prospective, controlled clinical trials published until July 2016, enrolling women treated with FSH alone or combined with other gonadotropins. Trials enrolling women with polycystic ovarian syndrome were excluded (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42016048404).ResultsConsidering 70 studies, the administration of FSH alone resulted in higher number of oocytes retrieved than FSH + LH or hMG. The MII oocytes number did not change when FSH alone was compared to FSH + LH, FSH + hCG, or hMG. Embryo number and implantation rate were higher when hMG was used instead of FSH alone. Pregnancy rate was significantly higher in FSH + LH-treated group vs. others. Only 12 studies reported live birth rate, not providing protocol-dependent differences. Patients’ stratification by GnRH agonist/antagonist identified patient subgroups benefiting from specific drug combinations.ConclusionIn COS, FSH alone results in higher oocyte number. HMG improves the collection of mature oocytes, embryos, and increases implantation rate. On the other hand, LH addition leads to higher pregnancy rate. This study supports the concept of a different clinical action of gonadotropins in COS, reflecting previous in vitro data.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fendo.2017.00114/fullfollicle-stimulating hormoneluteinizing hormonehuman chorionic gonadotropinhuman menopausal gonadotropinpregnancy rateassisted reproductive technology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniele Santi Daniele Santi Livio Casarini Livio Casarini Carlo Alviggi Manuela Simoni Manuela Simoni Manuela Simoni |
spellingShingle |
Daniele Santi Daniele Santi Livio Casarini Livio Casarini Carlo Alviggi Manuela Simoni Manuela Simoni Manuela Simoni Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis Frontiers in Endocrinology follicle-stimulating hormone luteinizing hormone human chorionic gonadotropin human menopausal gonadotropin pregnancy rate assisted reproductive technology |
author_facet |
Daniele Santi Daniele Santi Livio Casarini Livio Casarini Carlo Alviggi Manuela Simoni Manuela Simoni Manuela Simoni |
author_sort |
Daniele Santi |
title |
Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis |
title_short |
Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis |
title_full |
Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis |
title_sort |
efficacy of follicle-stimulating hormone (fsh) alone, fsh + luteinizing hormone, human menopausal gonadotropin or fsh + human chorionic gonadotropin on assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the “personalized” medicine era: a meta-analysis |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Endocrinology |
issn |
1664-2392 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
SettingLuteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) act on the same receptor, activating different signal transduction pathways. The role of LH or hCG addition to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as well as menopausal gonadotropins (human menopausal gonadotropin; hMG) in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is debated.ObjectiveTo compare FSH + LH, or FSH + hCG or hMG vs. FSH alone on COS outcomes.DesignA meta-analysis according to PRISMA statement and Cochrane Collaboration was performed, including prospective, controlled clinical trials published until July 2016, enrolling women treated with FSH alone or combined with other gonadotropins. Trials enrolling women with polycystic ovarian syndrome were excluded (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42016048404).ResultsConsidering 70 studies, the administration of FSH alone resulted in higher number of oocytes retrieved than FSH + LH or hMG. The MII oocytes number did not change when FSH alone was compared to FSH + LH, FSH + hCG, or hMG. Embryo number and implantation rate were higher when hMG was used instead of FSH alone. Pregnancy rate was significantly higher in FSH + LH-treated group vs. others. Only 12 studies reported live birth rate, not providing protocol-dependent differences. Patients’ stratification by GnRH agonist/antagonist identified patient subgroups benefiting from specific drug combinations.ConclusionIn COS, FSH alone results in higher oocyte number. HMG improves the collection of mature oocytes, embryos, and increases implantation rate. On the other hand, LH addition leads to higher pregnancy rate. This study supports the concept of a different clinical action of gonadotropins in COS, reflecting previous in vitro data. |
topic |
follicle-stimulating hormone luteinizing hormone human chorionic gonadotropin human menopausal gonadotropin pregnancy rate assisted reproductive technology |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fendo.2017.00114/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danielesanti efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis AT danielesanti efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis AT liviocasarini efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis AT liviocasarini efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis AT carloalviggi efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis AT manuelasimoni efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis AT manuelasimoni efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis AT manuelasimoni efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis |
_version_ |
1725450853151670272 |