Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis

SettingLuteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) act on the same receptor, activating different signal transduction pathways. The role of LH or hCG addition to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as well as menopausal gonadotropins (human menopausal gonadotropin; hMG) in control...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniele Santi, Livio Casarini, Carlo Alviggi, Manuela Simoni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fendo.2017.00114/full
id doaj-fe6b590c6e8f4024bdcb828621dd7f37
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe6b590c6e8f4024bdcb828621dd7f372020-11-24T23:58:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922017-06-01810.3389/fendo.2017.00114262054Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysisDaniele Santi0Daniele Santi1Livio Casarini2Livio Casarini3Carlo Alviggi4Manuela Simoni5Manuela Simoni6Manuela Simoni7Unit of Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Geriatrics, Azienda OU of Modena, Modena, ItalyUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyCenter for Genomic Research, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, ItalyUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalyUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Geriatrics, Azienda OU of Modena, Modena, ItalyCenter for Genomic Research, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, ItalySettingLuteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) act on the same receptor, activating different signal transduction pathways. The role of LH or hCG addition to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as well as menopausal gonadotropins (human menopausal gonadotropin; hMG) in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is debated.ObjectiveTo compare FSH + LH, or FSH + hCG or hMG vs. FSH alone on COS outcomes.DesignA meta-analysis according to PRISMA statement and Cochrane Collaboration was performed, including prospective, controlled clinical trials published until July 2016, enrolling women treated with FSH alone or combined with other gonadotropins. Trials enrolling women with polycystic ovarian syndrome were excluded (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42016048404).ResultsConsidering 70 studies, the administration of FSH alone resulted in higher number of oocytes retrieved than FSH + LH or hMG. The MII oocytes number did not change when FSH alone was compared to FSH + LH, FSH + hCG, or hMG. Embryo number and implantation rate were higher when hMG was used instead of FSH alone. Pregnancy rate was significantly higher in FSH + LH-treated group vs. others. Only 12 studies reported live birth rate, not providing protocol-dependent differences. Patients’ stratification by GnRH agonist/antagonist identified patient subgroups benefiting from specific drug combinations.ConclusionIn COS, FSH alone results in higher oocyte number. HMG improves the collection of mature oocytes, embryos, and increases implantation rate. On the other hand, LH addition leads to higher pregnancy rate. This study supports the concept of a different clinical action of gonadotropins in COS, reflecting previous in vitro data.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fendo.2017.00114/fullfollicle-stimulating hormoneluteinizing hormonehuman chorionic gonadotropinhuman menopausal gonadotropinpregnancy rateassisted reproductive technology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniele Santi
Daniele Santi
Livio Casarini
Livio Casarini
Carlo Alviggi
Manuela Simoni
Manuela Simoni
Manuela Simoni
spellingShingle Daniele Santi
Daniele Santi
Livio Casarini
Livio Casarini
Carlo Alviggi
Manuela Simoni
Manuela Simoni
Manuela Simoni
Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis
Frontiers in Endocrinology
follicle-stimulating hormone
luteinizing hormone
human chorionic gonadotropin
human menopausal gonadotropin
pregnancy rate
assisted reproductive technology
author_facet Daniele Santi
Daniele Santi
Livio Casarini
Livio Casarini
Carlo Alviggi
Manuela Simoni
Manuela Simoni
Manuela Simoni
author_sort Daniele Santi
title Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the “Personalized” Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of follicle-stimulating hormone (fsh) alone, fsh + luteinizing hormone, human menopausal gonadotropin or fsh + human chorionic gonadotropin on assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the “personalized” medicine era: a meta-analysis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Endocrinology
issn 1664-2392
publishDate 2017-06-01
description SettingLuteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) act on the same receptor, activating different signal transduction pathways. The role of LH or hCG addition to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as well as menopausal gonadotropins (human menopausal gonadotropin; hMG) in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is debated.ObjectiveTo compare FSH + LH, or FSH + hCG or hMG vs. FSH alone on COS outcomes.DesignA meta-analysis according to PRISMA statement and Cochrane Collaboration was performed, including prospective, controlled clinical trials published until July 2016, enrolling women treated with FSH alone or combined with other gonadotropins. Trials enrolling women with polycystic ovarian syndrome were excluded (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42016048404).ResultsConsidering 70 studies, the administration of FSH alone resulted in higher number of oocytes retrieved than FSH + LH or hMG. The MII oocytes number did not change when FSH alone was compared to FSH + LH, FSH + hCG, or hMG. Embryo number and implantation rate were higher when hMG was used instead of FSH alone. Pregnancy rate was significantly higher in FSH + LH-treated group vs. others. Only 12 studies reported live birth rate, not providing protocol-dependent differences. Patients’ stratification by GnRH agonist/antagonist identified patient subgroups benefiting from specific drug combinations.ConclusionIn COS, FSH alone results in higher oocyte number. HMG improves the collection of mature oocytes, embryos, and increases implantation rate. On the other hand, LH addition leads to higher pregnancy rate. This study supports the concept of a different clinical action of gonadotropins in COS, reflecting previous in vitro data.
topic follicle-stimulating hormone
luteinizing hormone
human chorionic gonadotropin
human menopausal gonadotropin
pregnancy rate
assisted reproductive technology
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fendo.2017.00114/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danielesanti efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis
AT danielesanti efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis
AT liviocasarini efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis
AT liviocasarini efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis
AT carloalviggi efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis
AT manuelasimoni efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis
AT manuelasimoni efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis
AT manuelasimoni efficacyoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshalonefshluteinizinghormonehumanmenopausalgonadotropinorfshhumanchorionicgonadotropinonassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomesinthepersonalizedmedicineeraametaanalysis
_version_ 1725450853151670272