City-Level Action in a City-Wide Urban Commons. Amsterdam, 1977-1983

<span class="abs_content">In the late 1970s, Amsterdam's squatted domain grew to comprise hundreds of buildings, and a city wide network of workspaces, bars, cultural venues and other infrastructure. The squatted domain, as it developed at the time, can be viewed as an urban com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hans Pruijt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Coordinamento SIBA 2020-11-01
Series:Partecipazione e Conflitto
Subjects:
Online Access:http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/23049
id doaj-fe673004c0b642499cf305582bd13a15
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fe673004c0b642499cf305582bd13a152021-06-28T08:02:41ZengCoordinamento SIBAPartecipazione e Conflitto1972-76232035-66092020-11-011331324133710.1285/i20356609v13i3p132420359City-Level Action in a City-Wide Urban Commons. Amsterdam, 1977-1983Hans Pruijt0Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam<span class="abs_content">In the late 1970s, Amsterdam's squatted domain grew to comprise hundreds of buildings, and a city wide network of workspaces, bars, cultural venues and other infrastructure. The squatted domain, as it developed at the time, can be viewed as an urban commons. For a section of the squatting community, the whole was far greater than merely the sum of its parts, which led to the creation of a horizontal, city level organization. Commoning strategies applied at the city level were organizing squatting days, setting up a collective process for legalization, and promoting alternative urban development. However, evictions prompted confrontational action and a number of groups adopted a confrontational identity. Operating outside the city-level organization, autonomous action teams formed. They perfected the skills involved in the defense of squats, and had informal leaders. Nevertheless, groups with both prefigurative and confrontational collective identities worked together, despite the cooperation being tenuous. The upshot was that a large number of squatter collectives were never evicted, but that squats were legalized instead.</span><br />http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/23049city level actioncollective identityprotestresistanceself-managementsquatterssquattingurban commonsurban movementurban planning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hans Pruijt
spellingShingle Hans Pruijt
City-Level Action in a City-Wide Urban Commons. Amsterdam, 1977-1983
Partecipazione e Conflitto
city level action
collective identity
protest
resistance
self-management
squatters
squatting
urban commons
urban movement
urban planning
author_facet Hans Pruijt
author_sort Hans Pruijt
title City-Level Action in a City-Wide Urban Commons. Amsterdam, 1977-1983
title_short City-Level Action in a City-Wide Urban Commons. Amsterdam, 1977-1983
title_full City-Level Action in a City-Wide Urban Commons. Amsterdam, 1977-1983
title_fullStr City-Level Action in a City-Wide Urban Commons. Amsterdam, 1977-1983
title_full_unstemmed City-Level Action in a City-Wide Urban Commons. Amsterdam, 1977-1983
title_sort city-level action in a city-wide urban commons. amsterdam, 1977-1983
publisher Coordinamento SIBA
series Partecipazione e Conflitto
issn 1972-7623
2035-6609
publishDate 2020-11-01
description <span class="abs_content">In the late 1970s, Amsterdam's squatted domain grew to comprise hundreds of buildings, and a city wide network of workspaces, bars, cultural venues and other infrastructure. The squatted domain, as it developed at the time, can be viewed as an urban commons. For a section of the squatting community, the whole was far greater than merely the sum of its parts, which led to the creation of a horizontal, city level organization. Commoning strategies applied at the city level were organizing squatting days, setting up a collective process for legalization, and promoting alternative urban development. However, evictions prompted confrontational action and a number of groups adopted a confrontational identity. Operating outside the city-level organization, autonomous action teams formed. They perfected the skills involved in the defense of squats, and had informal leaders. Nevertheless, groups with both prefigurative and confrontational collective identities worked together, despite the cooperation being tenuous. The upshot was that a large number of squatter collectives were never evicted, but that squats were legalized instead.</span><br />
topic city level action
collective identity
protest
resistance
self-management
squatters
squatting
urban commons
urban movement
urban planning
url http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/23049
work_keys_str_mv AT hanspruijt citylevelactioninacitywideurbancommonsamsterdam19771983
_version_ 1721356597592064000